Friday, August 7th, 2009

Any type of accident injuring the head may cause a serious condition called Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). This is a serious and life-altering injury. Traumatic Brain Injury is a serious brain injury that many individuals never recover from. It produces severe symptoms and may alter a victim’s personality, motor skills, communication skills, speech, and ability to reason or think clearly. Many victims of Traumatic Brain Injury are never able to work again. They will also require ongoing medical care and financial assistance for the rest of their lives.
Our traumatic brain injury attorneys will work relentlessly to get compensation for the victim. Many times, the victim will require medical assistance and monitoring the rest of their life. Our traumatic brain injury attorneys will consult with a medical expert to prepare a cost estimate of medical treatment for the rest of the victim’s life. In addition, our traumatic brain injury attorneys will obtain a detailed report showing the victim’s lost wages and any future earnings that the victim is entitled to receive. Let our traumatic brain injury attorneys handle your case so you may concentrate on getting better and making a full recovery.
Tags: Animal Attacks, Bankruptcy, Bike Accidents, Birth and Nursing Home Injuries, California Bar, Car Accidents, Defective Products, discovery, DUI Accidents, faqs, filing a complaint, injured, insurance companies, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, las vegas loan modification, Law Firm, Law Office of Josh Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, legal representation, Motorcycle Accidents, Mr. Harmon, Paralysis, Pedestrian Accidents, Personal Injury, principle reduction, short sale, Slip and Fall Injuries, Spinal Cord Injury, TBI, Traumatic Brain Injury, Trial Attorney, Truck Accidents
Posted in DUI, Personal Injury | Comments Off
Sunday, August 2nd, 2009

Collisions between a bike and a car often produce catastrophic injuries. A bike rider has no protection from a car accident. A collision will knock the bike rider to the ground and cause serious injuries. Common injuries from bike accidents include broken bones, spinal injuries, brain injuries, and paralysis. These injuries arise from a series of causes. First, the bike rider is struck by a car. Second, the bike rider falls to the ground. Third, the bike rider is struck by oncoming traffic as they lay in the street unable to move. Our bike accident attorneys are able to get you the money you deserve for your injuries.
Bike accidents will almost always require immediate and expensive medical care. This is the natural result of the traumatic forces involved in the collision. As well as secondary causes, such as being run over after the bike rider is knocked to the ground. Our bike accident attorneys can assist you in getting payment for medical bills, as well as future medical costs.
It is critical that an experienced bike accident attorney handle your case. Bike accident cases are complex and require detailed investigation. Frequently, the bike is mangled and it is impossible to determine where or how the car struck the bike and bike rider. In addition, there may be a lack of typical physical evidence such as skid marks. Our bike accident attorneys are skilled in reviewing and analyzing the facts of the accident and determining the cause of the bike accident. Frequent causes of bike accidents include:
Our bike accident attorneys can investigate your bike accident and help you concentrate on the recovery process. Bike accident victims may be entitled to significant financial compensation for their injuries. Our bike accident attorneys will work hard to get you all the money you deserve. You may receive money for your medical bills, pain and suffering, lost wages, future medical treatment, and a host of other reasons depending upon your case. If you have suffered an injury, please contact our bike accident attorneys immediately so we may begin getting you the money you deserve.
Tags: Animal Attacks, Bankruptcy, Bike Accidents, Birth and Nursing Home Injuries, California Bar, Car Accidents, Defective Products, discovery, DUI Accidents, faqs, felonies, injured, insurance companies, interest rate reduction, las vegas loan modification, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, legal representation, Loan Modification, making home affordable, Mr. Harmon, Pedestrian Accidents, Personal Injury, principle reduction, Slip and Fall Injuries, Spinal Cord Injury, Traumatic Brain Injury, Trial Attorney, Truck Accidents, Wrongful Death
Posted in Personal Injury | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009
Slip and Fall Accidents (Premises Liability)
A property or store owner is responsible for maintaining the location in a safe manner. An individual may recover damages from a person who allows a dangerous or unsafe condition to exist on their property. If a slip and fall accident happens, our slip and fall attorneys are available to assist you.
A slip and fall accident can happen anyplace there is an unsafe or dangerous condition. Common locations include grocery stores, movie theatres, restaurants, department stores, and unmarked stairs or drop-offs. Our slip and fall accident attorneys are able to evaluate your case and get you the maximum compensation for your injuries. Slip and fall accident victims may be entitled to significant financial compensation for their injuries. Our slip and fall accident attorneys will work hard to get you all the money you deserve. You may receive money for your medical bills, pain and suffering, lost wages, future medical treatment, and a host of other reasons depending upon your case. If you have suffered an injury, please contact our slip and fall accident attorneys immediately so we may begin getting you the money you deserve.
Tags: Animal Attacks, Bankruptcy, Bike Accidents, Birth and Nursing Home Injuries, California Bar, Car Accidents, Defective Products, discovery, DUI Accidents, injured, insurance companies, Joshua L. Harmon, las vegas loan modification, Law Firm, Law Office of Josh Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, lawsuit, legal representation, Litigation, Motorcycle Accidents, Mr. Harmon, Paralysis, Pedestrian Accidents, Personal Injury, short sale, Slip and Fall Injuries, Spinal Cord Injury, TBI, Traumatic Brain Injury, Trial Attorney, Truck Accidents, Wrongful Death
Posted in Personal Injury | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009
Slip and Fall Accidents
A property or store owner is responsible for maintaining the location in a safe manner. An individual may recover damages from a person who allows a dangerous or unsafe condition to exist on their property. If a slip and fall accident happens, our slip and fall attorneys are available to assist you.
A slip and fall accident can happen anyplace there is an unsafe or dangerous condition. Common locations include grocery stores, movie theatres, restaurants, department stores, and unmarked stairs or drop-offs. Our slip and fall accident attorneys are able to evaluate your case and get you the maximum compensation for your injuries. Slip and fall accident victims may be entitled to significant financial compensation for their injuries. Our slip and fall accident attorneys will work hard to get you all the money you deserve. You may receive money for your medical bills, pain and suffering, lost wages, future medical treatment, and a host of other reasons depending upon your case. If you have suffered an injury, please contact our slip and fall accident attorneys immediately so we may begin getting you the money you deserve.
Tags: Animal Attacks, Bike Accidents, Birth and Nursing Home Injuries, California Bar, Car Accidents, Defective Products, discovery, DUI Accidents, faqs, felonies, fixed mortgage, injured, insurance companies, interest rate reduction, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, las vegas loan modification, Law Office of Josh Harmon, lawsuit, legal representation, Litigation, Loan Modification, loan modifications, loan restructuring, making home affordable, Motorcycle Accidents, Mr. Harmon, Paralysis, Pedestrian Accidents, Personal Injury, principle reduction, short sale, Slip and Fall Injuries, Spinal Cord Injury, Traumatic Brain Injury, Trial Attorney, Truck Accidents, Wrongful Death
Posted in Personal Injury | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009

Car accidents in Las Vegas are an unfortunate reality. The roads are plagued with overly aggressive drivers or drivers that do not pay attention to the road and their surroundings. Drivers like these cause accidents.
Car accidents produce a wide range of injuries. These range from broken bones caused by the traumatic forces of collisions, to soreness and stiffness associated with “whiplash.” Our car accident attorneys frequently deal with insurance companies and notice they will typically try to deny all but the most obvious injuries. Insurance companies will attempt to deny certain injuries that are difficult to diagnose, such as whiplash or other soft-tissue injuries. They will also seek to refuse to reimburse medical expenses for diagnostic treatment such as an MRI or X-Rays. However, when our experienced car accident attorneys contact the insurance companies, they know these delaying tactics will not work and that they cannot take further advantage of a victim. Our car accident attorneys will work hard and force the insurance company to pay you all the money you deserve.
Unfortunately, car accidents frequently produce injuries. An injured victim is first struck by another driver; and second victimized by an insurance company that refuses to pay the victim a proper settlement for their injuries. Insurance companies have no incentive to properly compensate victims. Insurance companies are not in business to pay money to victims, they are in business to make money. Shortly after a collision, the insurance company may contact the victim and offer a small monetary settlement. This is almost never a fair settlement, and the insurance companies hope the victim does not contact a car accident attorney. Our car accident attorneys are able to get you the maximum compensation for your injuries, and prevent you from accepting a very unfair deal from a greedy insurance company.
Common injuries associated with car accidents are discussed in general “layman’s” terms below. For a complete diagnosis and treatment, please consult with your treating physician.
Car accident victims may be entitled to significant financial compensation for their injuries. Our car accident attorneys will work hard to get you all the money you deserve. You may receive money for your medical bills, pain and suffering, lost wages, future medical treatment, and a host of other reasons depending upon your case. If you have suffered an injury, please contact our car accident attorneys immediately so we may begin getting you the medical treatment and money you deserve.
Tags: Animal Attacks, Bike Accidents, Birth and Nursing Home Injuries, California Bar, Car Accidents, Defective Products, DUI Accidents, felonies, henderson auto accident, injured, insurance companies, intersection accident, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, las vegas accident, las vegas accident attorney, las vegas accident lawyer, las vegas auto accident, las vegas loan modification, Law Firm, Law Office of Josh Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, legal representation, Litigation, Mr. Harmon, north las vegas auto accident, Pedestrian Accidents, Slip and Fall Injuries, Spinal Cord Injury, TBI, Traumatic Brain Injury, Trial Attorney, Truck Accidents, Wrongful Death
Posted in Personal Injury | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009

Joshua L. Harmon, Esq.
Joshua L. Harmon, Esq. is the principal of the Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon. He concentrates his practice in personal injury law.
Mr. Harmon earned his Juris Doctor degree from Washington and Lee School of Law and his Bachelor degree, with honors, from Franklin & Marshall College. While at Franklin & Marshall College, Mr. Harmon worked as a Symbolic Logic Tutor and Classical History Preceptor. Prior to practicing law, Mr. Harmon was a member of the United States Military and attended the United States Army Drill Sergeant’s School.
Mr. Harmon began his legal career at the law firm of Harmon & Davies, P.C. Corporate clients were attracted to his aggressive results-oriented approach to litigation. His notable clients included Mars, Inc., Kal Kan Foods, Masterfoods USA, Sysco, Uncle Ben’s, and Amoi Electronics. Mr. Harmon spent approximately twelve (12) years at Harmon & Davies honing his trial skills.
Mr. Harmon later departed and formed his own law firm concentrating in the area that he enjoyed most – helping injured individuals. He personally handles all aspects of each client’s case and relentlessly pushes each case towards the most favorable resolution.
Mr. Harmon is admitted to the Nevada Bar, California Bar, and Pennsylvania Bar. He is an active member of the Nevada Trial Lawyers Association. He enjoys outdoor activities and spending time with his two year old daughter.
etc. Joshua L. Harmon, Esq. is the principal of the Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon. He concentrates his practice in personal injury law.
Tags: attorney, Bankruptcy, California Bar, Car Accidents, DUI Accidents, filing a complaint, fixed mortgage, insurance companies, interest rate reduction, Joshua L. Harmon, Las Vegas Attorney, Las Vegas Lawyer, las vegas loan modification, Law Firm, lawyer, legal help, legal representation, Loan Modification, loan restructuring, making home affordable, Motorcycle Accidents, Mr. Harmon, Pedestrian Accidents, principle reduction, short sale, Spinal Cord Injury, Traumatic Brain Injury, Wrongful Death
Posted in Personal Injury | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009

Mr. Harmon earned his Juris Doctor degree from Washington and Lee School of Law and his Bachelor degree, with honors, from Franklin & Marshall College. While at Franklin & Marshall College, Mr. Harmon worked as a Symbolic Logic Tutor and Classical History Preceptor. Prior to practicing law, Mr. Harmon was a member of the United States Military and attended the United States Army Drill Sergeant’s School.
Mr. Harmon began his legal career at the law firm of Harmon & Davies, P.C. Corporate clients were attracted to his aggressive results-oriented approach to litigation. His notable clients included Mars, Inc., Kal Kan Foods, Masterfoods USA, Sysco, Uncle Ben’s, and Amoi Electronics. Mr. Harmon spent approximately twelve (12) years at Harmon & Davies honing his trial skills.
Mr. Harmon later departed and formed his own law firm concentrating in the area that he enjoyed most – helping injured individuals. He personally handles all aspects of each client’s case and relentlessly pushes each case towards the most favorable resolution.
Mr. Harmon is admitted to the Nevada Bar, California Bar, and Pennsylvania Bar. He is an active member of the Nevada Trial Lawyers Association. He enjoys outdoor activities and spending time with his two year old daughter.
Joshua L. Harmon, Esq. is the principal of the Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon. He concentrates his practice in personal injury law.
Tags: Bankruptcy, Bike Accidents, Birth and Nursing Home Injuries, California Bar, Car Accidents, Defective Products, faqs, felonies, filing a complaint, fixed mortgage, interest rate reduction, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, las vegas loan modification, Law Firm, Law Office of Josh Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, legal representation, Litigation, loan mod, Loan Modification, loan modifications, loan restructuring, Motorcycle Accidents, Mr. Harmon, Personal Injury, principle reduction, Traumatic Brain Injury, Wrongful Death
Posted in Videos | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009
Chapter 7
Liquidation Under the Bankruptcy Code
The chapter of the Bankruptcy Code providing for “liquidation,” ( i.e., the sale of a debtor’s nonexempt property and the distribution of the proceeds to creditors.)
a. Alternatives to Chapter 7
b. Background
c. Chapter 7 Eligibility
d. How Chapter 7 Works
e. Role of the Case Trustee
f. The Chapter 7 Discharge
——————————————————————————–
Alternatives to Chapter 7
Debtors should be aware that there are several alternatives to chapter 7 relief. For example, debtors who are engaged in business, including corporations, partnerships, and sole proprietorships, may prefer to remain in business and avoid liquidation. Such debtors should consider filing a petition under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. Under chapter 11, the debtor may seek an adjustment of debts, either by reducing the debt or by extending the time for repayment, or may seek a more comprehensive reorganization. Sole proprietorships may also be eligible for relief under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code.
In addition, individual debtors who have regular income may seek an adjustment of debts under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. A particular advantage of chapter 13 is that it provides individual debtors with an opportunity to save their homes from foreclosure by allowing them to “catch up” past due payments through a payment plan. Moreover, the court may dismiss a chapter 7 case filed by an individual whose debts are primarily consumer rather than business debts if the court finds that the granting of relief would be an abuse of chapter 7. 11 U.S.C. § 707(b).
If the debtor’s “current monthly income”(1) is more than the state median, the Bankruptcy Code requires application of a “means test” to determine whether the chapter 7 filing is presumptively abusive. Abuse is presumed if the debtor’s aggregate current monthly income over 5 years, net of certain statutorily allowed expenses, is more than (i) $10,950, or (ii) 25% of the debtor’s nonpriority unsecured debt, as long as that amount is at least $6,575. (2) The debtor may rebut a presumption of abuse only by a showing of special circumstances that justify additional expenses or adjustments of current monthly income. Unless the debtor overcomes the presumption of abuse, the case will generally be converted to chapter 13 (with the debtor’s consent) or will be dismissed. 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(1).
Debtors should also be aware that out-of-court agreements with creditors or debt counseling services may provide an alternative to a bankruptcy filing.
Background
A chapter 7 bankruptcy case does not involve the filing of a plan of repayment as in chapter 13. Instead, the bankruptcy trustee gathers and sells the debtor’s nonexempt assets and uses the proceeds of such assets to pay holders of claims (creditors) in accordance with the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. Part of the debtor’s property may be subject to liens and mortgages that pledge the property to other creditors. In addition, the Bankruptcy Code will allow the debtor to keep certain “exempt” property; but a trustee will liquidate the debtor’s remaining assets. Accordingly, potential debtors should realize that the filing of a petition under chapter 7 may result in the loss of property.
Chapter 7 Eligibility
To qualify for relief under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, the debtor may be an individual, a partnership, or a corporation or other business entity. 11 U.S.C. §§ 101(41), 109(b). Subject to the means test described above for individual debtors, relief is available under chapter 7 irrespective of the amount of the debtor’s debts or whether the debtor is solvent or insolvent. An individual cannot file under chapter 7 or any other chapter, however, if during the preceding 180 days a prior bankruptcy petition was dismissed due to the debtor’s willful failure to appear before the court or comply with orders of the court, or the debtor voluntarily dismissed the previous case after creditors sought relief from the bankruptcy court to recover property upon which they hold liens. 11 U.S.C. §§ 109(g), 362(d) and (e). In addition, no individual may be a debtor under chapter 7 or any chapter of the Bankruptcy Code unless he or she has, within 180 days before filing, received credit counseling from an approved credit counseling agency either in an individual or group briefing. 11 U.S.C. §§ 109, 111. There are exceptions in emergency situations or where the U.S. trustee (or bankruptcy administrator) has determined that there are insufficient approved agencies to provide the required counseling. If a debt management plan is developed during required credit counseling, it must be filed with the court.
One of the primary purposes of bankruptcy is to discharge certain debts to give an honest individual debtor a “fresh start.” The debtor has no liability for discharged debts. In a chapter 7 case, however, a discharge is only available to individual debtors, not to partnerships or corporations. 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(1). Although an individual chapter 7 case usually results in a discharge of debts, the right to a discharge is not absolute, and some types of debts are not discharged. Moreover, a bankruptcy discharge does not extinguish a lien on property.
How Chapter 7 Works
A chapter 7 case begins with the debtor filing a petition with the bankruptcy court serving the area where the individual lives or where the business debtor is organized or has its principal place of business or principal assets. (3) In addition to the petition, the debtor must also file with the court: (1) schedules of assets and liabilities; (2) a schedule of current income and expenditures; (3) a statement of financial affairs; and (4) a schedule of executory contracts and unexpired leases. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1007(b). Debtors must also provide the assigned case trustee with a copy of the tax return or transcripts for the most recent tax year as well as tax returns filed during the case (including tax returns for prior years that had not been filed when the case began). 11 U.S.C. § 521. Individual debtors with primarily consumer debts have additional document filing requirements. They must file: a certificate of credit counseling and a copy of any debt repayment plan developed through credit counseling; evidence of payment from employers, if any, received 60 days before filing; a statement of monthly net income and any anticipated increase in income or expenses after filing; and a record of any interest the debtor has in federal or state qualified education or tuition accounts. Id. A husband and wife may file a joint petition or individual petitions. 11 U.S.C. § 302(a). Even if filing jointly, a husband and wife are subject to all the document filing requirements of individual debtors. (The Official Forms may be purchased at legal stationery stores or downloaded from the internet at www.uscourts.gov/bkforms/index.html. They are not available from the court.)
The courts must charge a $245 case filing fee, a $39 miscellaneous administrative fee, and a $15 trustee surcharge. Normally, the fees must be paid to the clerk of the court upon filing. With the court’s permission, however, individual debtors may pay in installments. 28 U.S.C. § 1930(a); Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1006(b); Bankruptcy Court Miscellaneous Fee Schedule, Item 8. The number of installments is limited to four, and the debtor must make the final installment no later than 120 days after filing the petition. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1006. For cause shown, the court may extend the time of any installment, provided that the last installment is paid not later than 180 days after filing the petition. Id. The debtor may also pay the $39 administrative fee and the $15 trustee surcharge in installments. If a joint petition is filed, only one filing fee, one administrative fee, and one trustee surcharge are charged. Debtors should be aware that failure to pay these fees may result in dismissal of the case. 11 U.S.C. § 707(a).
If the debtor’s income is less than 150% of the poverty level (as defined in the Bankruptcy Code), and the debtor is unable to pay the chapter 7 fees even in installments, the court may waive the requirement that the fees be paid. 28 U.S.C. § 1930(f).
In order to complete the Official Bankruptcy Forms that make up the petition, statement of financial affairs, and schedules, the debtor must provide the following information:
1. A list of all creditors and the amount and nature of their claims;
2. The source, amount, and frequency of the debtor’s income;
3. A list of all of the debtor’s property; and
4. A detailed list of the debtor’s monthly living expenses, i.e., food, clothing, shelter, utilities, taxes, transportation, medicine, etc.
Married individuals must gather this information for their spouse regardless of whether they are filing a joint petition, separate individual petitions, or even if only one spouse is filing. In a situation where only one spouse files, the income and expenses of the non-filing spouse is required so that the court, the trustee and creditors can evaluate the household’s financial position.
Among the schedules that an individual debtor will file is a schedule of “exempt” property. The Bankruptcy Code allows an individual debtor (4) to protect some property from the claims of creditors because it is exempt under federal bankruptcy law or under the laws of the debtor’s home state. 11 U.S.C. § 522(b). Many states have taken advantage of a provision in the Bankruptcy Code that permits each state to adopt its own exemption law in place of the federal exemptions. In other jurisdictions, the individual debtor has the option of choosing between a federal package of exemptions or the exemptions available under state law. Thus, whether certain property is exempt and may be kept by the debtor is often a question of state law. The debtor should consult an attorney to determine the exemptions available in the state where the debtor lives.
Filing a petition under chapter 7 “automatically stays” (stops) most collection actions against the debtor or the debtor’s property. 11 U.S.C. § 362. But filing the petition does not stay certain types of actions listed under 11 U.S.C. § 362(b), and the stay may be effective only for a short time in some situations. The stay arises by operation of law and requires no judicial action. As long as the stay is in effect, creditors generally may not initiate or continue lawsuits, wage garnishments, or even telephone calls demanding payments. The bankruptcy clerk gives notice of the bankruptcy case to all creditors whose names and addresses are provided by the debtor.
Between 20 and 40 days after the petition is filed, the case trustee (described below) will hold a meeting of creditors. If the U.S. trustee or bankruptcy administrator (5) schedules the meeting at a place that does not have regular U.S. trustee or bankruptcy administrator staffing, the meeting may be held no more than 60 days after the order for relief. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2003(a). During this meeting, the trustee puts the debtor under oath, and both the trustee and creditors may ask questions. The debtor must attend the meeting and answer questions regarding the debtor’s financial affairs and property. 11 U.S.C. § 343. If a husband and wife have filed a joint petition, they both must attend the creditors’ meeting and answer questions. Within 10 days of the creditors’ meeting, the U.S. trustee will report to the court whether the case should be presumed to be an abuse under the means test described in 11 U.S.C. § 704(b).
It is important for the debtor to cooperate with the trustee and to provide any financial records or documents that the trustee requests. The Bankruptcy Code requires the trustee to ask the debtor questions at the meeting of creditors to ensure that the debtor is aware of the potential consequences of seeking a discharge in bankruptcy such as the effect on credit history, the ability to file a petition under a different chapter, the effect of receiving a discharge, and the effect of reaffirming a debt. Some trustees provide written information on these topics at or before the meeting to ensure that the debtor is aware of this information. In order to preserve their independent judgment, bankruptcy judges are prohibited from attending the meeting of creditors. 11 U.S.C. § 341(c).
In order to accord the debtor complete relief, the Bankruptcy Code allows the debtor to convert a chapter 7 case to case under chapter 11, 12 or 13 (6) as long as the debtor is eligible to be a debtor under the new chapter. However, a condition of the debtor’s voluntary conversion is that the case has not previously been converted to chapter 7 from another chapter. 11 U.S.C. § 706(a). Thus, the debtor will not be permitted to convert the case repeatedly from one chapter to another.
Role of the Case Trustee
When a chapter 7 petition is filed, the U.S. trustee (or the bankruptcy court in Alabama and North Carolina) appoints an impartial case trustee to administer the case and liquidate the debtor’s nonexempt assets. 11 U.S.C. §§ 701, 704. If all the debtor’s assets are exempt or subject to valid liens, the trustee will normally file a “no asset” report with the court, and there will be no distribution to unsecured creditors. Most chapter 7 cases involving individual debtors are no asset cases. But if the case appears to be an “asset” case at the outset, unsecured creditors (7) must file their claims with the court within 90 days after the first date set for the meeting of creditors. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3002(c). A governmental unit, however, has 180 days from the date the case is filed to file a claim. 11 U.S.C. § 502(b)(9). In the typical no asset chapter 7 case, there is no need for creditors to file proofs of claim because there will be no distribution. If the trustee later recovers assets for distribution to unsecured creditors, the Bankruptcy Court will provide notice to creditors and will allow additional time to file proofs of claim. Although a secured creditor does not need to file a proof of claim in a chapter 7 case to preserve its security interest or lien, there may be other reasons to file a claim. A creditor in a chapter 7 case who has a lien on the debtor’s property should consult an attorney for advice.
Commencement of a bankruptcy case creates an “estate.” The estate technically becomes the temporary legal owner of all the debtor’s property. It consists of all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property as of the commencement of the case, including property owned or held by another person if the debtor has an interest in the property. Generally speaking, the debtor’s creditors are paid from nonexempt property of the estate.
The primary role of a chapter 7 trustee in an asset case is to liquidate the debtor’s nonexempt assets in a manner that maximizes the return to the debtor’s unsecured creditors. The trustee accomplishes this by selling the debtor’s property if it is free and clear of liens (as long as the property is not exempt) or if it is worth more than any security interest or lien attached to the property and any exemption that the debtor holds in the property. The trustee may also attempt to recover money or property under the trustee’s “avoiding powers.” The trustee’s avoiding powers include the power to: set aside preferential transfers made to creditors within 90 days before the petition; undo security interests and other prepetition transfers of property that were not properly perfected under nonbankruptcy law at the time of the petition; and pursue nonbankruptcy claims such as fraudulent conveyance and bulk transfer remedies available under state law. In addition, if the debtor is a business, the bankruptcy court may authorize the trustee to operate the business for a limited period of time, if such operation will benefit creditors and enhance the liquidation of the estate. 11 U.S.C. § 721.
Section 726 of the Bankruptcy Code governs the distribution of the property of the estate. Under § 726, there are six classes of claims; and each class must be paid in full before the next lower class is paid anything. The debtor is only paid if all other classes of claims have been paid in full. Accordingly, the debtor is not particularly interested in the trustee’s disposition of the estate assets, except with respect to the payment of those debts which for some reason are not dischargeable in the bankruptcy case. The individual debtor’s primary concerns in a chapter 7 case are to retain exempt property and to receive a discharge that covers as many debts as possible.
The Chapter 7 Discharge
A discharge releases individual debtors from personal liability for most debts and prevents the creditors owed those debts from taking any collection actions against the debtor. Because a chapter 7 discharge is subject to many exceptions, though, debtors should consult competent legal counsel before filing to discuss the scope of the discharge. Generally, excluding cases that are dismissed or converted, individual debtors receive a discharge in more than 99 percent of chapter 7 cases. In most cases, unless a party in interest files a complaint objecting to the discharge or a motion to extend the time to object, the bankruptcy court will issue a discharge order relatively early in the case – generally, 60 to 90 days after the date first set for the meeting of creditors. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 4004(c).
The grounds for denying an individual debtor a discharge in a chapter 7 case are narrow and are construed against the moving party. Among other reasons, the court may deny the debtor a discharge if it finds that the debtor: failed to keep or produce adequate books or financial records; failed to explain satisfactorily any loss of assets; committed a bankruptcy crime such as perjury; failed to obey a lawful order of the bankruptcy court; fraudulently transferred, concealed, or destroyed property that would have become property of the estate; or failed to complete an approved instructional course concerning financial management. 11 U.S.C. § 727; Fed. R. Bankr. P. 4005.
Secured creditors may retain some rights to seize property securing an underlying debt even after a discharge is granted. Depending on individual circumstances, if a debtor wishes to keep certain secured property (such as an automobile), he or she may decide to “reaffirm” the debt. A reaffirmation is an agreement between the debtor and the creditor that the debtor will remain liable and will pay all or a portion of the money owed, even though the debt would otherwise be discharged in the bankruptcy. In return, the creditor promises that it will not repossess or take back the automobile or other property so long as the debtor continues to pay the debt.
If the debtor decides to reaffirm a debt, he or she must do so before the discharge is entered. The debtor must sign a written reaffirmation agreement and file it with the court. 11 U.S.C. § 524(c). The Bankruptcy Code requires that reaffirmation agreements contain an extensive set of disclosures described in 11 U.S.C. § 524(k). Among other things, the disclosures must advise the debtor of the amount of the debt being reaffirmed and how it is calculated and that reaffirmation means that the debtor’s personal liability for that debt will not be discharged in the bankruptcy. The disclosures also require the debtor to sign and file a statement of his or her current income and expenses which shows that the balance of income paying expenses is sufficient to pay the reaffirmed debt. If the balance is not enough to pay the debt to be reaffirmed, there is a presumption of undue hardship, and the court may decide not to approve the reaffirmation agreement. Unless the debtor is represented by an attorney, the bankruptcy judge must approve the reaffirmation agreement.
If the debtor was represented by an attorney in connection with the reaffirmation agreement, the attorney must certify in writing that he or she advised the debtor of the legal effect and consequences of the agreement, including a default under the agreement. The attorney must also certify that the debtor was fully informed and voluntarily made the agreement and that reaffirmation of the debt will not create an undue hardship for the debtor or the debtor’s dependants. 11 U.S.C. § 524(k). The Bankruptcy Code requires a reaffirmation hearing if the debtor has not been represented by an attorney during the negotiating of the agreement, or if the court disapproves the reaffirmation agreement.11 U.S.C. § 524(d) and (m). The debtor may repay any debt voluntarily, however, whether or not a reaffirmation agreement exists. 11 U.S.C. § 524(f).
An individual receives a discharge for most of his or her debts in a chapter 7 bankruptcy case. A creditor may no longer initiate or continue any legal or other action against the debtor to collect a discharged debt. But not all of an individual’s debts are discharged in chapter 7. Debts not discharged include debts for alimony and child support, certain taxes, debts for certain educational benefit overpayments or loans made or guaranteed by a governmental unit, debts for willful and malicious injury by the debtor to another entity or to the property of another entity, debts for death or personal injury caused by the debtor’s operation of a motor vehicle while the debtor was intoxicated from alcohol or other substances, and debts for certain criminal restitution orders.11 U.S.C. § 523(a). The debtor will continue to be liable for these types of debts to the extent that they are not paid in the chapter 7 case. Debts for money or property obtained by false pretenses, debts for fraud or defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity, and debts for willful and malicious injury by the debtor to another entity or to the property of another entity will be discharged unless a creditor timely files and prevails in an action to have such debts declared nondischargeable. 11 U.S.C. § 523(c); Fed. R. Bankr. P. 4007(c).
The court may revoke a chapter 7 discharge on the request of the trustee, a creditor, or the U.S. trustee if the discharge was obtained through fraud by the debtor, if the debtor acquired property that is property of the estate and knowingly and fraudulently failed to report the acquisition of such property or to surrender the property to the trustee, or if the debtor (without a satisfactory explanation) makes a material misstatement or fails to provide documents or other information in connection with an audit of the debtor’s case. 11 U.S.C. § 727(d).
——————————————————————————–
NOTES
1. The “current monthly income” received by the debtor is a defined term in the Bankruptcy Code and means the average monthly income received over the six calendar months before commencement of the bankruptcy case, including regular contributions to household expenses from nondebtors and including income from the debtor’s spouse if the petition is a joint petition, but not including social security income or certain payments made because the debtor is the victim of certain crimes. 11 U.S.C. § 101(10A). return to text
2. To determine whether a presumption of abuse arises, all individual debtors with primarily consumer debts who file a chapter 7 case must complete Official Bankruptcy Form B22A, entitled “Statement of Current Monthly Income and Means Test Calculation – For Use in Chapter 7.” (The Official Forms may be purchased at legal stationery stores or downloaded from the internet at www.uscourts.gov/bkforms/index.html. They are not available from the court.) return to text
3. An involuntary chapter 7 case may be commenced under certain circumstances by a petition filed by creditors holding claims against the debtor. 11 U.S.C. § 303. return to text
4. Each debtor in a joint case (both husband and wife) can claim exemptions under the federal bankruptcy laws. 11 U.S.C. § 522(m). return to text
5. In North Carolina and Alabama, bankruptcy administrators perform similar functions that U.S. trustees perform in the remaining 48 states. These duties include establishing a panel of private trustees to serve as trustees in chapter 7 cases and supervising the administration of cases and trustees in cases under chapters 7, 11, 12, and 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. The bankruptcy administrator program is administered by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, while the U.S. trustee program is administered by the Department of Justice. For purposes of this publication, references to U.S. trustees are also applicable to bankruptcy administrators. return to text
6. A fee is charged for converting, on request of the debtor, a case under chapter 7 to a case under chapter 11. The fee charged is the difference between the filing fee for a chapter 7 and the filing fee for a chapter 11. 28 U.S.C. § 1930(a). Currently, the difference is $755. Id. There is no fee for converting from chapter 7 to chapter 13. return to text
7. Unsecured debts generally may be defined as those for which the extension of credit was based purely upon an evaluation by the creditor of the debtor’s ability to pay, as opposed to secured debts, for which the extension of credit was based upon the creditor’s right to seize collateral on default, in addition to the debtor’s ability to pay. return to text
Source: http://www.uscourts.gov/bankruptcycourts/bankruptcybasics/process.html
Tags: Bankruptcy, California Bar, DUI Accidents, filing a complaint, fixed loan, fixed mortgage, insurance companies, interest rate reduction, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, las vegas loan modification, Law Office of Josh Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, lawsuit, Motorcycle Accidents, Mr. Harmon, Paralysis, Pedestrian Accidents, principle reduction, short sale, Slip and Fall Injuries
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009
| The Obama Administration has introduced a comprehensive Financial Stability Plan to address the key problems at the heart of the current crisis and get our economy back on track. A critical piece of that effort is Making Home Affordable, a plan to stabilize our housing market and help up to 7 to 9 million Americans reduce their monthly mortgage payments to more affordable levels.
The Home Affordable Refinance Program gives up to 4 to 5 million homeowners with loans owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac an opportunity to refinance into more affordable monthly payments. The Home Affordable Modification Program commits $75 billion to keep up to 3 to 4 million Americans in their homes by preventing avoidable foreclosures. Our consumer website, www.MakingHomeAffordable.gov, provides homeowners with detailed information about these programs along with self-assessment tools and calculators to empower borrowers with the resources they need to determine whether they might be eligible for a modification or a refinance under the Administration’s program. Through this website, borrowers can also connect with free counseling resources to help with outstanding questions; locate homeowner events in their communities; find a handy checklist of key documents and materials to have ready when making that important call to their servicer as well as FAQs from borrowers in similar circumstances; and much more. We hope that you will find this website informative and useful as we all work together to solve our nation’s housing crisis and put our country on the path to a lasting economic recovery. |
Tags: Animal Attacks, Bankruptcy, California Bar, fixed mortgage, interest rate reduction, Joshua L. Harmon, las vegas loan modification, Law Office of Josh Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, legal representation, loan mod, Loan Modification, loan modifications, loan restructuring, making home affordable, Mr. Harmon, principle reduction, short sale, Trial Attorney
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009
| U.S. Foreclosure Market Report Q1 2009 Heat Map. (PRNewsFoto/RealtyTrac Inc.) IRVINE, CA UNITED STATES |
|||
U.S. Foreclosure Activity Up 24 Percent From Q1 2008
March Activity Up 17 Percent From February, 46 Percent From March 2008
IRVINE, Calif., April 16 /PRNewswire/ -- RealtyTrac(R)
(http://www.realtytrac.com), the leading online marketplace for foreclosure
properties, today released its U.S. Foreclosure Market Report(TM) for Q1
2009, which shows that foreclosure filings -- default notices, auction sale
notices and bank repossessions -- were reported on 803,489 properties in
the first quarter, a 9 percent increase from the previous quarter and an
increase of nearly 24 percent from Q1 2008. One in every 159 U.S. housing
units received a foreclosure filing during the quarter.
Foreclosure filings were reported on 341,180 properties in March, a 17
percent increase from the previous month and a 46 percent increase from
March 2008. The March and Q1 2009 totals were the highest monthly and
quarterly totals since RealtyTrac began issuing its report in January 2005
despite a decrease in bank repossessions (REOs), which were down 13 percent
from the fourth quarter of 2008 and 3 percent from February totals.
"In the month of March we saw a record level of foreclosure activity --
the number of households that received a foreclosure filing was more than
12 percent higher than the next highest month on record. Since much of this
activity was in new foreclosure actions, it suggests that many lenders and
servicers were holding off on executing foreclosures due to industry
moratoria and legislative delays," said James J. Saccacio, chief executive
officer of RealtyTrac. "It's also likely that the drop in REO activity can
be attributed to these processing delays, rather than to any of the
foreclosure prevention programs currently in place. It's very likely that
we'll see the number of REOs increase again now that most of the moratoria
have been lifted."
"On a positive note, it appears that demand is up in some of the
harder-hit areas, particularly on bank-owned REO properties that first time
homebuyers and investors see as bargains," Saccacio continued. "But it's
unlikely that this increased demand will be enough to offset the growing
number of foreclosures in the pipeline, accelerated by rising unemployment
rates."
Nevada, Arizona, California post top state foreclosure rates in first
quarter
Nevada continued to document the nation's highest state foreclosure
rate in the first quarter, with one in every 27 housing units receiving a
foreclosure filing -- more than five times the national average.
Foreclosure filings were reported on 41,296 Nevada properties during the
quarter, an increase of 19 percent from the previous quarter and an
increase of nearly 111 percent from Q1 2008. Bank repossessions in Nevada
were down 3 percent from the previous quarter, but defaults increased 27
percent and auction sale notices increased 35 percent.
Arizona posted the nation's second highest state foreclosure rate for
the first quarter, with one in every 54 housing units receiving a
foreclosure filing, and California posted the nation's third highest state
foreclosure rate, with one in every 58 housing units receiving a
foreclosure filing.
Other states with foreclosure rates ranking among the top 10 in the
first quarter were Florida, Illinois, Michigan, Georgia, Idaho, Utah and
Oregon.
Five states account for nearly 60 percent of nation's first quarter
total
California, Florida, Arizona, Nevada and Illinois accounted for nearly
60 percent of the nation's foreclosure activity in the first quarter, with
479,516 properties receiving foreclosure filings in the five states
combined.
With 230,915 properties receiving foreclosure filings during the
quarter, California accounted for nearly 29 percent of the nation's total.
The state's foreclosure activity increased 35 percent from the previous
quarter and 36 percent from Q1 2008, and the first-quarter total was
state's highest quarterly total since RealtyTrac began issuing its report
in the first quarter of 2005.
Despite a 12 percent decrease from the previous quarter, Florida's
first quarter total was still second highest in the nation. Foreclosure
filings were reported on 119,220 Florida properties, a 36 percent increase
from the first quarter of 2008. The state posted the nation's fourth
highest state foreclosure rate during the quarter, with one in every 73
housing units receiving a foreclosure filing.
Foreclosure filings were reported on 49,119 Arizona properties in the
first quarter of 2009, the third highest total among the states, and 41,296
Nevada properties received a foreclosure filing in the first quarter of
2009, the fourth highest total among the states.
Illinois posted the nation's fifth highest total, with 38,966
properties receiving a foreclosure filing during the first quarter -- a 32
percent increase from the previous quarter and a 68 percent increase from
the first quarter of 2008. With one in every 135 housing units receiving a
foreclosure filing, the state's foreclosure rate also ranked fifth highest
among the states.
Rounding out the states with the 10 highest foreclosure activity totals
in Q1 2009 were Michigan, Ohio, Georgia, Texas and Virginia.
Report methodology
The RealtyTrac U.S. Foreclosure Market Report provides a count of the
total number of properties with at least one foreclosure filing reported
during the month or quarter -- broken out by type of filing at the state
and national level. Data is also available at the individual county level
for both Q1 2009 and March 2009. Data is collected from more than 2,200
counties nationwide, and those counties account for more than 90 percent of
the U.S. population. RealtyTrac's report incorporates documents filed in
all three phases of foreclosure: Default -- Notice of Default (NOD) and Lis
Pendens (LIS); Auction -- Notice of Trustee Sale and Notice of Foreclosure
Sale (NTS and NFS); and Real Estate Owned, or REO properties (that have
been foreclosed on and repurchased by a bank). If more than one foreclosure
document is filed against a property during the month or quarter, only the
most recent filing is counted in the report.
U.S. Foreclosure Market Data by State - Q1 2009
Properties with Foreclosure Filings
Rate State
Rank Name NOD LIS NTS NFS
-- U.S. 156,933 149,852 225,752 80,409
35 Alabama 0 0 2,291 0
33 Alaska 0 0 349 0
2 Arizona 21 0 35,079 0
20 Arkansas 536 0 2,973 0
3 California 124,875 0 60,256 0
12 Colorado 7 0 9,186 0
15 Connecticut 0 4,256 16 461
31 Delaware 0 1 6 607
District of Columbia 274 0 400 0
4 Florida 0 70,114 183 33,035
7 Georgia 1 0 18,938 0
26 Hawaii 300 0 1,094 0
8 Idaho 2,141 0 1,954 0
5 Illinois 0 19,848 120 11,612
14 Indiana 0 4,588 93 4,523
38 Iowa 0 0 718 0
32 Kansas 0 335 16 915
42 Kentucky 0 116 28 1,003
40 Louisiana 0 9 19 1,507
39 Maine 206 81 281 144
16 Maryland 0 6,547 21 1,584
27 Massachusetts 0 4,282 11 1,401
6 Michigan 791 0 21,863 0
25 Minnesota 8 0 3,750 0
44 Mississippi 0 0 630 0
28 Missouri 32 0 4,003 0
47 Montana 0 0 23 0
48 Nebraska 0 161 10 18
1 Nevada 20,534 0 10,320 0
19 New Hampshire 0 0 1,648 0
24 New Jersey 0 7,254 16 2,771
41 New Mexico 0 294 4 266
37 New York 0 7,647 15 2,296
36 North Carolina 514 0 2,253 0
45 North Dakota 0 0 1 44
11 Ohio 0 12,279 137 10,398
34 Oklahoma 802 0 1,249 0
10 Oregon 3,166 0 5,465 0
30 Pennsylvania 0 4,477 27 4,277
18 Rhode Island 0 0 830 0
23 South Carolina 0 3,196 29 1,372
49 South Dakota 0 0 1 92
17 Tennessee 1 0 5,753 0
29 Texas 34 0 14,564 0
9 Utah 2,396 0 1,982 0
50 Vermont 0 0 1 0
13 Virginia 294 0 9,858 0
21 Washington 0 0 6,810 0
46 West Virginia 0 0 285 0
22 Wisconsin 0 4,367 67 2,083
43 Wyoming 0 0 126 0
1/every % change % change
Rate State X HU from from
Rank Name REO Total (rate) Q4 08 Q1 08
-- U.S. 190,543 803,489 159 9.16 23.63
35 Alabama 1,378 3,669 582 74.71 115.82*
33 Alaska 202 551 512 -24.31 14.55
2 Arizona 14,019 49,119 54 6.22 79.24
20 Arkansas 1,072 4,581 281 -3.23 22.09
3 California 45,784 230,915 58 35.13 35.97
12 Colorado 3,412 12,605 169 -13.84 -33.64
15 Connecticut 1,143 5,876 245 -6.76 -23.01
31 Delaware 214 828 469 2.60 54.19
District of Columbia 163 837 340 4.23 -23.14
4 Florida 15,888 119,220 73 -12.19 35.64
7 Georgia 9,669 28,608 138 10.66 0.37
26 Hawaii 160 1,554 326 25.32 318.87
8 Idaho 198 4,293 147 15.56 137.18*
5 Illinois 7,386 38,966 135 31.66 67.85
14 Indiana 3,253 12,457 223 -6.01 -10.61
38 Iowa 854 1,572 846 -8.92 0.38
32 Kansas 1,285 2,551 478 35.55 82.74
42 Kentucky 588 1,735 1,099 -3.29 9.67
40 Louisiana 436 1,971 943 15.87 1.70
39 Maine 64 776 898 -14.25 32.20
16 Maryland 1,137 9,289 250 -7.39 -18.47
27 Massachusetts 2,499 8,193 332 -9.16 -49.94
6 Michigan 10,530 33,184 136 -1.98 12.32
25 Minnesota 3,415 7,173 321 7.83 69.53
44 Mississippi 138 768 1,634 57.38 67.69*
28 Missouri 3,256 7,291 363 -13.75t -17.55t
47 Montana 130 153 2,847 -44.96 -63.66
48 Nebraska 33 222 3,517 29.07 -70.08
1 Nevada 10,442 41,296 27 19.13 110.75
19 New Hampshire 577 2,225 267 4.26 24.44
24 New Jersey 1,668 11,709 299 -29.17 -10.65
41 New Mexico 253 817 1,055 6.80 -30.88
37 New York 1,059 11,017 721 31.69 -23.37
36 North Carolina 3,221 5,988 689 -19.69 -41.77
45 North Dakota 76 121 2,567 -4.72 142.00*
11 Ohio 8,781 31,595 160 -3.14 1.10
34 Oklahoma 861 2,912 557 1.68 -10.10
10 Oregon 1,916 10,547 153 29.41 151.00*
30 Pennsylvania 3,016 11,797 464 5.36 99.92*
18 Rhode Island 881 1,711 264 -23.79 8.22
23 South Carolina 2,419 7,016 288 27.10 261.84*
49 South Dakota 3 96 3,721 -20.66 50.00
17 Tennessee 4,608 10,362 263 2.03 -16.36tt
29 Texas 10,661 25,259 373 14.87 -25.03
9 Utah 1,765 6,143 151 12.47 86.77
50 Vermont 20 21 14,830 -59.62 600.00*
13 Virginia 4,573 14,725 222 -10.73t 11.97t
21 Washington 2,903 9,713 283 2.69 46.32
46 West Virginia 50 335 2,635 95.91 134.27
22 Wisconsin 2,393 8,910 287 57.70 57.09*
43 Wyoming 91 217 1,117 -11.07 32.32
*Actual increase may not be as high due to data collection changes or
Improvements
t Collection of some records previously classified as NOD in this state
was discontinued starting in January 2009
tt Collection of some records previously classified as NOD in this state
was discontinued starting in September 2008
U.S. Foreclosure Rates Heat Map - Q1 2009
(Photo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20090416/LA99849)
U.S. Foreclosure Market Data by State - March 2009
Properties with Foreclosure Filings
Rate State
Rank Name NOD LIS NTS NFS
-- U.S. 72,790 58,741 104,856 33,042
29 Alabama 0 0 1,655 0
33 Alaska 0 0 155 0
3 Arizona 3 0 14,012 0
18 Arkansas 234 0 1,203 0
2 California 58,858 0 34,575 0
10 Colorado 2 0 3,703 0
13 Connecticut 0 2,187 0 158
28 Delaware 0 0 0 339
District of Columbia 98 0 153 0
4 Florida 0 26,964 0 13,566
5 Georgia 0 0 8,136 0
21 Hawaii 149 0 509 0
7 Idaho 1,133 0 726 0
8 Illinois 0 7,362 0 4,740
14 Indiana 0 1,964 1 1,587
40 Iowa 0 0 181 0
34 Kansas 0 170 0 305
42 Kentucky 0 15 0 398
37 Louisiana 0 7 0 740
41 Maine 0 81 0 144
20 Maryland 0 2,210 0 732
31 Mass. 0 1,708 0 456
9 Michigan 0 0 8,286 0
24 Minnesota 2 0 1,929 0
46 Mississippi 0 0 179 0
30 Missouri 3 0 1,630 0
48 Montana 0 0 6 0
44 Nebraska 0 161 0 6
1 Nevada 10,351 0 5,055 0
23 New Hampshire 0 0 617 0
25 New Jersey 0 2,748 0 1,098
39 New Mexico 0 134 0 93
36 New York 0 3,459 0 721
38 North Carolina 213 0 653 0
47 North Dakota 0 0 0 22
11 Ohio 0 4,828 0 4,447
35 Oklahoma 324 0 580 0
12 Oregon 28 0 2,766 0
32 Pennsylvania 0 1,777 0 1,891
22 Rhode Island 0 0 300 0
26 South Carolina 0 1,069 0 485
49 South Dakota 0 0 0 24
16 Tennessee 0 0 2,496 0
27 Texas 16 0 7,151 0
6 Utah 1,372 0 1,013 0
50 Vermont 0 0 0 0
15 Virginia 4 0 3,971 0
17 Washington 0 0 3,031 0
45 West Virginia 0 0 135 0
19 Wisconsin 0 1,897 0 1,090
43 Wyoming 0 0 49 0
% change % change
Rate State from from
Rank Name REO Total Feb 09 Mar 08
-- U.S. 71,751 341,180 17.46 46.37
29 Alabama 605 2,260 216.97* 248.23*
33 Alaska 69 224 10.34 16.67
3 Arizona 4,861 18,876 4.18 105.20
18 Arkansas 486 1,923 19.00 58.93
2 California 14,352 107,785 33.44 66.56
10 Colorado 1,875 5,580 32.26 -9.71
13 Connecticut 540 2,885 29.95 35.70
28 Delaware 92 431 57.88 124.48
District of Columbia 77 328 -13.46 6.84
4 Florida 6,601 47,131 1.60 55.78
5 Georgia 5,230 13,366 31.23 20.99
21 Hawaii 66 724 34.82 503.33
7 Idaho 62 1,921 8.90 192.39*
8 Illinois 3,296 15,398 8.30 78.57
14 Indiana 1,574 5,126 16.34 0.14
40 Iowa 305 486 -16.06 -5.08
34 Kansas 369 844 -27.92 18.87
42 Kentucky 218 631 5.52 -8.68
37 Louisiana 200 947 39.68 51.28
41 Maine 24 249 -4.60 27.04
20 Maryland 392 3,334 4.97 -22.01
31 Mass. 508 2,672 -9.12 -52.05
9 Michigan 4,131 12,417 -1.17 30.79
24 Minnesota 1,146 3,077 19.54 132.58
46 Mississippi 42 221 -24.83 17.55
30 Missouri 1,082 2,715 -13.23 -19.39t
48 Montana 56 62 14.81 -59.74
44 Nebraska 16 183 1307.69 -33.21
1 Nevada 4,443 19,849 25.76 159.16
23 New Hampshire 207 824 11.50 99.03
25 New Jersey 724 4,570 39.37 1.96
39 New Mexico 119 346 -7.24 1.17
36 New York 329 4,509 10.84 -11.38
38 North Carolina 1,111 1,977 -3.04 -40.05
47 North Dakota 31 53 43.24 562.50*
11 Ohio 3,336 12,611 12.29 11.87
35 Oklahoma 215 1,119 8.64 -22.67
12 Oregon 594 3,388 -6.10 107.47*
32 Pennsylvania 1,275 4,943 17.92 70.45*
22 Rhode Island 333 633 54.77 59.05
26 South Carolina 812 2,366 -4.33 153.86*
49 South Dakota 1 25 -21.88 56.25
16 Tennessee 1,925 4,421 19.78 13.16tt
27 Texas 3,449 10,616 0.85 -0.79
6 Utah 700 3,085 70.91 150.81
50 Vermont 4 4 -63.64 100.00*
15 Virginia 1,780 5,755 19.32 16.66t
17 Washington 1,205 4,236 37.71 89.62
45 West Virginia 27 162 45.95 138.24
19 Wisconsin 825 3,812 27.66 83.89*
43 Wyoming 31 80 -1.23 -2.44
*Actual increase may not be as high due to data collection changes or
Improvements
t Collection of some records previously classified as NOD in this state
was discontinued starting in January 2009
tt Collection of some records previously classified as NOD in this state
was discontinued starting in September 2008
About RealtyTrac Inc.
RealtyTrac (http://www.realtytrac.com) is the leading online marketplace of
foreclosure properties, with more than 1.5 million default, auction and
bank-owned listings from over 2,200 U.S. counties, along with detailed
property, loan and home sales data. Hosting more than 3 million unique
monthly visitors, RealtyTrac provides innovative technology solutions and
practical education resources to facilitate buying, selling and investing
in real estate. RealtyTrac's foreclosure data has also been used by the
Federal Reserve, FBI, U.S. Senate Joint Economic Committee and Banking
Committee, U.S. Treasury Department, and numerous state housing and banking
departments to help evaluate foreclosure trends and address policy issues
related to foreclosures.
|
Tags: Bankruptcy, California Bar, fixed loan, fixed mortgage, insurance companies, interest rate reduction, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, legal representation, Loan Modification, making home affordable, Mr. Harmon, principle reduction, short sale
Posted in Loan Modification | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009
This section is for frequently asked questions related to Personal Injury Cases. Please feel free to browse some of the most common questions we encounter when assisting people who have suffered.
1.
Tags: Animal Attacks, Bankruptcy, Bike Accidents, Birth and Nursing Home Injuries, Blue Diamond, Boulder City, California Bar, Car Accidents, casino accidents, Clark County, Defective Products, discovery, Drunk Driving Accidents, DUI Accidents, Family Medical Leave Act, faqs, filing a complaint, fixed loan, fixed mortgage, Henderson, injured, insurance companies, interest rate reduction, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, Lake Mead, Las Vegas, Law Firm, Law Office of Josh Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, lawsuit, leg injuries, legal representation, Litigation, loan restructuring, medical malpractice, Motorcycle Accidents, Mr. Harmon, negligent operation, negotiating, Nevada, Nevada Bar, Nevada Trial Lawyers Association, North Las Vegas, Nye County, Pahrump, Paralysis, Pedestrian Accidents, Pennsylvania Bar, Personal Injury, Pothole Fall, practice areas, premises liability, Product Liability, short sale, Slip and Fall Injuries, Spinal Cord Injury, Taxi Accident, TBI, Traumatic Brain Injury, Trial Attorney, Trip, Truck Accident, Truck Accidents, Uninsured Motorist, verdicts and settlements, Wrongful Death
Posted in Personal Injury | Comments Off