Thursday, August 13th, 2009
By Jane Sutton
MIAMI (Reuters) – Federal agents working with the U.S. Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) executed search warrants at two Florida banks on Monday and Colonial Bank (CNB.N) said one of them was its office in Orlando.
A spokeswoman for the Alabama-based bank told Reuters a warrant had been served at the bank’s Orlando location but could not say what was the target of the warrants.
“The bank is cooperating,” Colonial Senior Vice President Merrie Tolbert told Reuters by telephone. “Colonial continues to operate as usual. This search warrant has no impact on our day-to-day retail and commercial banking operations.”
A spokeswoman with the office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, which buys assets from troubled financial institutions to stabilize the banking industry, would only say that its agents executed two search warrants in Florida on Monday.
“Due to the nature of the ongoing investigation we cannot provide any further information,” the agency said in a news release.
FBI agents joined the search but declined to comment.
Tolbert could not confirm local media reports that the second warrant was executed at a bank branch in the central Florida town of Ocala.
Shares of parent company Colonial BancGroup Inc plunged 18 percent on Monday after it had said on Friday that a key $300 million investment from Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Co had fallen through, raising doubts about its survival.
Colonial BancGroup, which last month was issued a cease-and-desist order by the regulators, said it was exploring strategic capital alternatives, including a sale or merger of the company.
The shares have lost more than 90 percent of their value in the past year.
Colonial BancGroup operates 355 branches in Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Nevada and Texas and has more than $25 billion in assets. Its failure would be the largest this year.
(Editing by Pascal Fletcher and Maureen Bavdek)
Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/hotStocksNews/idUSTRE5724PT20090803
Tags: Bankruptcy, colonial bank, insurance companies, interest rate reduction, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, las vegas loan modification, Law Office of Josh Harmon, lawsuit, legal representation, taylor bean and whitaker
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off
Friday, August 7th, 2009

Spinal cord injury x-ray
Our spinal cord injury attorneys will work relentlessly to get compensation for the victim. Many times, the victim will require medical assistance and monitoring the rest of their life. Our spinal cord injury attorneys will consult with a medical expert to prepare a cost estimate of medical treatment for the rest of the victim’s life. In addition, our spinal cord injury attorneys will obtain a detailed report showing the victim’s lost wages and any future earnings that the victim is entitled to receive. Let our spinal cord injury attorneys handle your case so you may concentrate on getting better and making a full recovery.
Any type of accident may cause an injury to the spinal cord. This is a serious and life-altering injury. It produces severe symptoms that will alter a person’s life. Many times, a spinal cord injury produces paralysis or other loss of motion. Unfortunately, many of these injuries are permanent and the victim will never recover fully from the accident. Victims with a spinal injury may never be able to walk again. In addition, the victim may require full-time care, such as a nurse, and may never be able to work again. They will also require ongoing medical care and financial assistance for the rest of their lives.
Tags: Animal Attacks, Bike Accidents, Birth and Nursing Home Injuries, Car Accidents, Defective Products, discovery, DUI Accidents, filing a complaint, injured, insurance companies, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, Law Firm, Law Office of Josh Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, lawsuit, legal representation, Litigation, Motorcycle Accidents, Mr. Harmon, Paralysis, Pedestrian Accidents, Personal Injury, Slip and Fall Injuries, Spinal Cord Injury, TBI, Traumatic Brain Injury, Trial Attorney, Truck Accidents, Wrongful Death
Posted in Personal Injury | Comments Off
Friday, August 7th, 2009

Any type of accident injuring the head may cause a serious condition called Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). This is a serious and life-altering injury. Traumatic Brain Injury is a serious brain injury that many individuals never recover from. It produces severe symptoms and may alter a victim’s personality, motor skills, communication skills, speech, and ability to reason or think clearly. Many victims of Traumatic Brain Injury are never able to work again. They will also require ongoing medical care and financial assistance for the rest of their lives.
Our traumatic brain injury attorneys will work relentlessly to get compensation for the victim. Many times, the victim will require medical assistance and monitoring the rest of their life. Our traumatic brain injury attorneys will consult with a medical expert to prepare a cost estimate of medical treatment for the rest of the victim’s life. In addition, our traumatic brain injury attorneys will obtain a detailed report showing the victim’s lost wages and any future earnings that the victim is entitled to receive. Let our traumatic brain injury attorneys handle your case so you may concentrate on getting better and making a full recovery.
Tags: Animal Attacks, Bankruptcy, Bike Accidents, Birth and Nursing Home Injuries, California Bar, Car Accidents, Defective Products, discovery, DUI Accidents, faqs, filing a complaint, injured, insurance companies, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, las vegas loan modification, Law Firm, Law Office of Josh Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, legal representation, Motorcycle Accidents, Mr. Harmon, Paralysis, Pedestrian Accidents, Personal Injury, principle reduction, short sale, Slip and Fall Injuries, Spinal Cord Injury, TBI, Traumatic Brain Injury, Trial Attorney, Truck Accidents
Posted in DUI, Personal Injury | Comments Off
Friday, August 7th, 2009

Any type of accident injuring the head may cause a serious condition called Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). This is a serious and life-altering injury. Traumatic Brain Injury is a serious brain injury that many individuals never recover from. It produces severe symptoms and may alter a victim’s personality, motor skills, communication skills, speech, and ability to reason or think clearly. Many victims of Traumatic Brain Injury are never able to work again. They will also require ongoing medical care and financial assistance for the rest of their lives.
Our traumatic brain injury attorneys will work relentlessly to get compensation for the victim. Many times, the victim will require medical assistance and monitoring the rest of their life. Our traumatic brain injury attorneys will consult with a medical expert to prepare a cost estimate of medical treatment for the rest of the victim’s life. In addition, our traumatic brain injury attorneys will obtain a detailed report showing the victim’s lost wages and any future earnings that the victim is entitled to receive. Let our traumatic brain injury attorneys handle your case so you may concentrate on getting better and making a full recovery.
Tags: Animal Attacks, Bike Accidents, Birth and Nursing Home Injuries, Car Accidents, Defective Products, discovery, DUI Accidents, filing a complaint, injured, insurance companies, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, las vegas loan modification, Law Office of Josh Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, legal representation, Motorcycle Accidents, Paralysis, Pedestrian Accidents, Personal Injury, Slip and Fall Injuries, Spinal Cord Injury, TBI, Traumatic Brain Injury, Trial Attorney, Truck Accidents, Wrongful Death
Posted in DUI, Personal Injury | Comments Off
Friday, August 7th, 2009
Nursing Home Abuse and Neglect
The population of Las Vegas is growing older as baby boomers approach retirement age. There is an increased demand for nursing home care. Unfortunately, the nursing home industry contains some unfit operators that do not adequately care for their elderly patients. Too often, elderly patients can not care for themselves – that is the reason families turn to nursing homes for assistance. But sometimes nursing homes do not perform the job families pay them to perform. Unfortunately, the elderly patient may have difficulty communicating and is unable to inform family members about any abuse. The nursing home may also abuse the elderly by increasing or decreasing necessary medications, which may further hamper the patient’s ability to complain about the abuse or alert family. Nursing home abuse continues to increase as our population ages.
Family members may protect their loved ones by looking for signs or symptoms of abuse. These signs may be physical or mental. Physical signs of nursing home abuse may include bed sores, malnutrition, unsanitary conditions, bruising, or over-medication. Our nursing home abuse attorneys can discuss physical signs of abuse with your family. Mental signs of nursing home abuse may include personality changes, paranoia, emotional outbursts, distress, or failure to communicate with loved ones. Our nursing home abuse attorneys can discuss mental signs of abuse with your family. Nursing home abuse is often difficult to diagnose and frequently is not discovered without active involvement from the family and knowledgeable nursing home abuse attorneys.
Our nursing home abuse attorneys will work hard to end the abuse and get your loved one the maximum compensation they deserve. They may be entitled to money to compensate them for their pain and suffering, medical costs for future medical care, and punitive damages to punish the nursing home for their malicious behavior. Contact our nursing home abuse attorneys today to discuss your case and help your loved one.
Tags: Animal Attacks, Bike Accidents, Birth and Nursing Home Injuries, Car Accidents, Defective Products, discovery, DUI Accidents, filing a complaint, injured, insurance companies, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, las vegas loan modification, Law Firm, Law Office of Josh Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, lawsuit, legal representation, Litigation, loan restructuring, Mr. Harmon, Paralysis, Personal Injury, Slip and Fall Injuries, Spinal Cord Injury, TBI, Traumatic Brain Injury
Posted in Personal Injury | Comments Off
Sunday, August 2nd, 2009
The Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon
provides aggressive representation to injured victims. We provide proactive and aggressive representation because the best results are earned through your attorney’s hard work. Insurance companies did not get rich by paying out large damage claims – so it is important to let an experienced attorney handle your injury claim.
The firm handles all types of injury and accident claims. We assist you in getting your life back together while you concentrate on healing the damage to your body. The law firm will guide you through the complex legal environment caused by insurance companies aggressively denying claims. We provide detailed analysis into critical questions such as what caused the accident, who is at fault, who can be held legally responsible, what insurance coverage is available, and how to position your case for maximum recovery. We also are skilled at describing and portraying your injuries in a vivid and detailed manner so that any insurance company knows the extent of compensation you should receive. Our informative analysis and experience is critical in negotiating a satisfactory resolution.
Unfortunately, some claims cannot be fully resolved through negotiation and require litigation. This is the process of filing a lawsuit in Court and possibly culminating in a jury trial. The litigation process can be a rewarding experience, but it is also time-consuming. Any client must understand that the best results take time so that your case can be properly positioned to achieve the maximum recovery. We do not advertise “quick” cash. We commit ourselves to a maximum recovery and recognize that the best results often take time and hard work. Many attorneys that seek to resolve your case quickly are unwilling to put in the work and time to obtain the highest possible dollar amount.
The litigation process begins at the Court. The process is initiated by filing a Complaint which provides the factual basis for your claim and identifies your legal theories for recovery. The other side typically has twenty (20) days to respond to the Complaint. Then, the process called “discovery” begins. The discovery process is a fact finding procedure. The sides will interview witnesses and record individuals’ testimony through the deposition process. In addition, the sides will seek and exchange relevant documents and attempt to narrow the issues that are presented to a jury. The typical discovery process lasts six (6) to twelve (12) months. After that, the Court will assign a trial date and the parties will present their cases to a jury.
Whether your case is successfully resolved through negotiation or litigation, we will assist you through the process and aggressively seek the largest monetary recovery possible.
We look forward to helping you through this difficult stage of your life. Please contact us immediately so we may begin to process your claim
Tags: Defective Products, discovery, filing a complaint, injured, insurance companies, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, las vegas loan modification, Law Firm, Law Office of Josh Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, legal representation, Mr. Harmon, Personal Injury, Spinal Cord Injury, TBI, Traumatic Brain Injury, Trial Attorney
Posted in Personal Injury | Comments Off
Sunday, August 2nd, 2009
Animal Attacks
Pet owners have a duty to properly restrain and handle their dogs or other animals. This may include ensuring the animal is on a leash when it is outside the home or that the dog is properly fenced onto the owners’ property. When a dog is not leashed or not properly confined to the residence, serious injuries can occur. Our dog bit attorneys are available to evaluate your case and assist in determining who is liable for the dog bite.
Many dogs in Las Vegas, such as pit bulls and rottweillers are aggressive by nature and can seriously injure an individual. These dogs can be extremely violent if not properly trained and handled. The newspapers report numerous mauling incidents. These are some of the most serious and heart-wrenching tales because they often involve infants, toddlers, or others unable to protect themselves. A dog’s powerful jaws can rend flesh and inflict life-threatening wounds in a matter of seconds. Many of these injuries produce severe scarring that never heals.
Injured victims can hold dog owners legally responsible for a violent dog’s actions. The most common legal claim is negligence – for failing to properly leash the dog or failing to properly train the dog. In addition, if the dog attacks a “guest” in the owner’s home, the owner may be legally liable responsible as well. Most comprehensive homeowner’s insurance policies provide insurance coverage for dog attacks. Thus, if a pet owner’s dog attacks a person, that injury will typically trigger insurance coverage. And most homeowners have insurance because it is paid by their mortgage holder through an escrow account, whether the homeowner knows this or not. So unless the individual owns their home “free and clear” and has no mortgage, there should be insurance coverage for a dog bite or attack.
Our dog bite attorneys are able to evaluate your case and get you the maximum compensation for your injuries. Dog bite victims may be entitled to significant financial compensation for their injuries. Our dog bite attorneys will work hard to get you all the money you deserve. You may receive money for your medical bills, pain and suffering, lost wages, future medical treatment, and a host of other reasons depending upon your case. If you have suffered a dog bite, please contact our dog bite attorneys immediately so we may begin getting you the money you deserve.
Tags: Animal Attacks, Birth and Nursing Home Injuries, Car Accidents, Defective Products, discovery, DUI Accidents, faqs, felonies, filing a complaint, injured, interest rate reduction, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, las vegas loan modification, Law Office of Josh Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, legal representation, Motorcycle Accidents, Mr. Harmon, Paralysis, Pedestrian Accidents, Personal Injury, Spinal Cord Injury, TBI, Trial Attorney
Posted in Personal Injury | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009
Paralysis
Any type of accident may cause an injury that results in paralysis. This is a serious and life-altering injury. It produces severe symptoms that will alter a person’s life, causing the loss of motion in one or more areas of the body. Unfortunately, many of these injuries are permanent and the victim will never recover fully from the accident. Victims with paralysis may never be able to walk again. In addition, the victim may require full-time care, such as a nurse, and may never be able to work again. They will also require ongoing medical care and financial assistance for the rest of their lives.
Our paralysis attorneys will work relentlessly to get compensation for the victim. Many times, the victim will require medical assistance and monitoring the rest of their life. Our paralysis attorneys will consult with a medical expert to prepare a cost estimate of medical treatment for the rest of the victim’s life. In addition, our paralysis attorneys will obtain a detailed report showing the victim’s lost wages and any future earnings that the victim is entitled to receive. Let our paralysis attorneys handle your case so you may concentrate on getting better and making a full recovery.
Tags: Birth and Nursing Home Injuries, Car Accidents, Defective Products, DUI Accidents, faqs, injured, insurance companies, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, las vegas loan modification, Law Firm, Law Office of Josh Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, lawsuit, legal representation, Litigation, Motorcycle Accidents, Mr. Harmon, Paralysis, Pedestrian Accidents, Personal Injury, Slip and Fall Injuries, Spinal Cord Injury, TBI, Traumatic Brain Injury, Trial Attorney, Truck Accidents, Wrongful Death
Posted in DUI, Personal Injury, Traffic Tickets | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009
DUI Accidents – Drunk Driving Accident
It is illegal in Nevada to operate a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol level of 0.08 or higher. (NRS 484.379). Las Vegas is a 24 hour town and many bars or casinos never close. Every day, people make the disastrous decision to operate their car after they have drunk too much alcohol. Not only are there criminal penalties for this behavior, but also it can have a far more tragic outcome, such as injuring or killing another driver. Drunk driving accidents happen around the clock in Las Vegas – anytime and anyplace. It is only a matter of time until a habitual drunk driver causes an accident and irrevocably impacts someone else’s life. Our DUI accident attorneys are experienced in dealing with the aftermath of a DUI accident and will allow you to focus on recovering from your injuries.
Unfortunately, DUI accidents frequently produce injuries. An injured victim is first struck by drunk driver; and second victimized by an insurance company that refuses to pay the victim a proper settlement for their injuries. Insurance companies have no incentive to properly compensate victims. Insurance companies are not in business to pay money to victims, they are in business to make money. Shortly after a collision, the insurance company may contact the victim and offer a small monetary settlement. This is almost never a fair settlement, and the insurance companies hope the victim does not contact a DUI accident attorney. Our DUI accident attorneys are able to get you the maximum compensation for your injuries, and prevent you from accepting a very unfair deal from a greedy insurance company.
DUI accidents produce a wide range of injuries. These range from broken bones caused by the traumatic forces of collisions, to soreness and stiffness associated with “whiplash.” Our DUI accident attorneys frequently deal with insurance companies and notice they will typically try to deny all but the most obvious injuries. Insurance companies will attempt to deny certain injuries that are difficult to diagnose, such as whiplash or other soft-tissue injuries. They will also seek to refuse to reimburse medical expenses for diagnostic treatment such as an MRI or X-Rays. However, when our experienced DUI accident attorneys contact the insurance companies, they know these delaying tactics will not work and that they cannot take further advantage of a victim. Our DUI accident attorneys will work hard and force the insurance company to pay you all the money you deserve.
Common injuries associated with DUI accidents are discussed in general “layman’s” terms below. For a complete diagnosis and treatment, please consult with your treating physician.
DUI accident victims may be entitled to significant financial compensation for their injuries. Our DUI accident attorneys will work hard to get you all the money you deserve. You may receive money for your medical bills, pain and suffering, lost wages, future medical treatment, and a host of other reasons depending upon your case. If you have suffered an injury, please contact our DUI accident attorneys immediately so we may begin getting you the medical treatment and money you deserve.
Tags: Bike Accidents, Car Accidents, Drunk, Drunken Driving, DUI, DUI Accidents, injured, insurance companies, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, Law Office of Josh Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, lawsuit, legal representation, Litigation, Motorcycle Accidents, Mr. Harmon, Paralysis, Pedestrian Accidents, Personal Injury, Slip and Fall Injuries, Traumatic Brain Injury, Trial Attorney, Truck Accidents, Wrongful Death
Posted in Criminal, DUI, Personal Injury, Traffic Tickets | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009

DUI Accident, drinking and driving
DUI Accidents – Drunk Driving Accident
It is illegal in Nevada to operate a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol level of 0.08 or higher. (NRS 484.379). Las Vegas is a 24 hour town and many bars or casinos never close. Every day, people make the disastrous decision to operate their car after they have drunk too much alcohol. Not only are there criminal penalties for this behavior, but also it can have a far more tragic outcome, such as injuring or killing another driver. Drunk driving accidents happen around the clock in Las Vegas – anytime and anyplace. It is only a matter of time until a habitual drunk driver causes an accident and irrevocably impacts someone else’s life. Our DUI accident attorneys are experienced in dealing with the aftermath of a DUI accident and will allow you to focus on recovering from your injuries.
Unfortunately, DUI accidents frequently produce injuries. An injured victim is first struck by drunk driver; and second victimized by an insurance company that refuses to pay the victim a proper settlement for their injuries. Insurance companies have no incentive to properly compensate victims. Insurance companies are not in business to pay money to victims, they are in business to make money. Shortly after a collision, the insurance company may contact the victim and offer a small monetary settlement. This is almost never a fair settlement, and the insurance companies hope the victim does not contact a DUI accident attorney. Our DUI accident attorneys are able to get you the maximum compensation for your injuries, and prevent you from accepting a very unfair deal from a greedy insurance company.
DUI accidents produce a wide range of injuries. These range from broken bones caused by the traumatic forces of collisions, to soreness and stiffness associated with “whiplash.” Our DUI accident attorneys frequently deal with insurance companies and notice they will typically try to deny all but the most obvious injuries. Insurance companies will attempt to deny certain injuries that are difficult to diagnose, such as whiplash or other soft-tissue injuries. They will also seek to refuse to reimburse medical expenses for diagnostic treatment such as an MRI or X-Rays. However, when our experienced DUI accident attorneys contact the insurance companies, they know these delaying tactics will not work and that they cannot take further advantage of a victim. Our DUI accident attorneys will work hard and force the insurance company to pay you all the money you deserve.
Common injuries associated with DUI accidents are discussed in general “layman’s” terms below. For a complete diagnosis and treatment, please consult with your treating physician.
DUI accident victims may be entitled to significant financial compensation for their injuries. Our DUI accident attorneys will work hard to get you all the money you deserve. You may receive money for your medical bills, pain and suffering, lost wages, future medical treatment, and a host of other reasons depending upon your case. If you have suffered an injury, please contact our DUI accident attorneys immediately so we may begin getting you the medical treatment and money you deserve.
Tags: Car Accidents, DUI Accidents, faqs, injured, insurance companies, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, las vegas loan modification, Law Firm, Law Office of Josh Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, lawsuit, legal representation, Litigation, Motorcycle Accidents, Mr. Harmon, Paralysis, Pedestrian Accidents, Personal Injury, Slip and Fall Injuries, Spinal Cord Injury, TBI, Traumatic Brain Injury, Trial Attorney, Truck Accidents, Wrongful Death
Posted in Criminal, DUI, Personal Injury | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009

18 wheel Diesel truck accident at traffic intersection
Collisions involving commercial trucks often produce catastrophic injuries. This is a natural result of the forces involved in trucking accidents. Many commercial trucks weigh upwards of 80,000 pounds, compared with approximately 2,200 pounds for a typical car. So, in a trucking accident, the enormous size and weight of the commercial truck produces serious injuries in almost every case. Furthermore, commercial trucks often have bumpers or sides that do not match the typical height of a normal car bumper – which removes or negates one of the most common car safety devices. Another unfortunate reality is that commercial trucks have a much higher ground clearance. If a car impacts the side of a commercial truck, the top half of the car is often sheared completely off the bottom half of the car – with disastrous results for the car driver. Our truck accident attorneys will investigate the accident scene and determine who is at fault for the truck accident.
It is critical that an experienced truck accident attorney handle your case. Truck accident cases are much more complex than a typical car accident case. Commercial truck drivers are governed by a different set of rules than other drivers. Our truck accident attorneys will thoroughly investigate your case. It is imperative to obtain and analyze evidence relating to the trucking accident. For example, our truck accident attorneys will obtain:

Las Vegas 18 wheel Diesel truck accident at traffic intersection
In some cases, commercial truck accidents occur because of driver error or fatigue. Truck drivers may not pay attention to the road, and not notice oncoming traffic. They may also force their way into oncoming traffic thinking that any car can stop prior to hitting them. A common cause of truck accidents is driver fatigue. Commercial truck drivers are sometimes paid for each delivery, so this encourages truck drivers to stay on the road instead of resting or taking a break. These financial incentives encourage truck drivers to continue driving when they are tired and dangerous – leading to truck accidents. It can also encourage truck drivers to skip necessary maintenance because they are in a hurry to continue with their delivery rather than stopping to have brakes checked or other maintenance performed in a timely manner. Our truck accident attorneys are experienced in investigating these possible causes of a truck accident.
Truck accident victims may be entitled to significant financial compensation for their injuries. Our truck accident attorneys will work hard to get you all the money you deserve. You may receive money for your medical bills, pain and suffering, lost wages, future medical treatment, and a host of other reasons depending upon your case. If you have suffered an injury, please contact our truck accident attorneys immediately so we may begin getting you the money you deserve.
Tags: Bike Accidents, catastrophic injuries, commercial truck, commercial trucking complaint, dangerous, driver error, DUI Accidents, faqs, fatigue, felonies, filing a complaint, financial compensation, financial incentive, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, las vegas loan modification, Law Office of Josh Harmon, lawsuit, legal representation, Motorcycle Accidents, Paralysis, Pedestrian Accidents, Personal Injury, Spinal Cord Injury, TBI, tired, Traumatic Brain Injury, Trial Attorney, Truck Accidents, Wrongful Death
Posted in DUI, Personal Injury, Traffic Tickets | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009
Motorcycle accidents cause severe injuries because the rider lacks the protective cocoon of an automobile. Cars are specifically designed to minimize injuries in a crash and utilize many safety features. Motorcycles lack these basic safety measures such as seatbelts and air bags. In addition, a small impact from a car can cause a motorcycle rider to lose control of his bike and suffer serious injuries.
Our motorcycle accident attorneys will review your motorcycle accident and determine who should be held responsible for any injuries you suffer. There are three typical causes of accidents that our motorcycle accident attorneys handle. First, another driver may cause the motorcycle accident. Motorcycles are hard to see because they are small. Unfortunately, aggressive drivers feel that a small motorcycle must move out of their way. Car drivers may pull out in front of a motorcycle, or cut a motorcycle off, when they would never take that action in the face of another oncoming car or truck. Our motorcycle accident attorneys will hold these aggressive drivers responsible for their actions. Second, road conditions may cause a motorcycle accident. Motorcycles are extremely vulnerable to road conditions.
The current construction on Las Vegas roadways and highways creates difficulties for riders. Improperly marked roads or unsafe construction zones may appear suddenly and cause a motorcycle accident. Our motorcycle accident attorneys will fully investigate the accident scene and determine who was responsible for any unsafe road condition. Third, motorcycle equipment may cause a motorcycle accident or contribute to any injuries. For example, faulty brakes or defective tires may be the primary cause of a particular motorcycle accident. Protective clothing such as a helmet or riding clothing may also be defective, allowing injuries which should never have occurred. Our motorcycle accident attorneys will investigate all possible factors causing the motorcycle accident and promptly pursue them to obtain the maximum compensation for an injured rider.
Motorcycle accident victims may be entitled to significant financial compensation for their injuries. Our motorcycle accident attorneys will work hard to get you all the money you deserve. You may receive money for your medical bills, pain and suffering, lost wages, future medical treatment, and a host of other reasons depending upon your case. If you have suffered an injury, please contact our motorcycle accident attorneys immediately so we may begin getting you the money you deserve.
Tags: Animal Attacks, Bike Accidents, Car Accidents, Defective Products, DUI Accidents, injured, insurance companies, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, las vegas loan modification, Law Office of Josh Harmon, lawsuit, legal representation, Motorcycle Accidents, Paralysis, Pedestrian Accidents, Personal Injury, Slip and Fall Injuries, Spinal Cord Injury, TBI, Traumatic Brain Injury, Trial Attorney, Truck Accidents, Wrongful Death
Posted in Criminal, DUI, Personal Injury, Traffic Tickets | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009
Slip and Fall Accidents
A property or store owner is responsible for maintaining the location in a safe manner. An individual may recover damages from a person who allows a dangerous or unsafe condition to exist on their property. If a slip and fall accident happens, our slip and fall attorneys are available to assist you.
A slip and fall accident can happen anyplace there is an unsafe or dangerous condition. Common locations include grocery stores, movie theatres, restaurants, department stores, and unmarked stairs or drop-offs. Our slip and fall accident attorneys are able to evaluate your case and get you the maximum compensation for your injuries. Slip and fall accident victims may be entitled to significant financial compensation for their injuries. Our slip and fall accident attorneys will work hard to get you all the money you deserve. You may receive money for your medical bills, pain and suffering, lost wages, future medical treatment, and a host of other reasons depending upon your case. If you have suffered an injury, please contact our slip and fall accident attorneys immediately so we may begin getting you the money you deserve.
Tags: Animal Attacks, Bike Accidents, Birth and Nursing Home Injuries, California Bar, Car Accidents, Defective Products, discovery, DUI Accidents, faqs, felonies, fixed mortgage, injured, insurance companies, interest rate reduction, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, las vegas loan modification, Law Office of Josh Harmon, lawsuit, legal representation, Litigation, Loan Modification, loan modifications, loan restructuring, making home affordable, Motorcycle Accidents, Mr. Harmon, Paralysis, Pedestrian Accidents, Personal Injury, principle reduction, short sale, Slip and Fall Injuries, Spinal Cord Injury, Traumatic Brain Injury, Trial Attorney, Truck Accidents, Wrongful Death
Posted in Personal Injury | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009

Car accidents in Las Vegas are an unfortunate reality. The roads are plagued with overly aggressive drivers or drivers that do not pay attention to the road and their surroundings. Drivers like these cause accidents.
Car accidents produce a wide range of injuries. These range from broken bones caused by the traumatic forces of collisions, to soreness and stiffness associated with “whiplash.” Our car accident attorneys frequently deal with insurance companies and notice they will typically try to deny all but the most obvious injuries. Insurance companies will attempt to deny certain injuries that are difficult to diagnose, such as whiplash or other soft-tissue injuries. They will also seek to refuse to reimburse medical expenses for diagnostic treatment such as an MRI or X-Rays. However, when our experienced car accident attorneys contact the insurance companies, they know these delaying tactics will not work and that they cannot take further advantage of a victim. Our car accident attorneys will work hard and force the insurance company to pay you all the money you deserve.
Unfortunately, car accidents frequently produce injuries. An injured victim is first struck by another driver; and second victimized by an insurance company that refuses to pay the victim a proper settlement for their injuries. Insurance companies have no incentive to properly compensate victims. Insurance companies are not in business to pay money to victims, they are in business to make money. Shortly after a collision, the insurance company may contact the victim and offer a small monetary settlement. This is almost never a fair settlement, and the insurance companies hope the victim does not contact a car accident attorney. Our car accident attorneys are able to get you the maximum compensation for your injuries, and prevent you from accepting a very unfair deal from a greedy insurance company.
Common injuries associated with car accidents are discussed in general “layman’s” terms below. For a complete diagnosis and treatment, please consult with your treating physician.
Car accident victims may be entitled to significant financial compensation for their injuries. Our car accident attorneys will work hard to get you all the money you deserve. You may receive money for your medical bills, pain and suffering, lost wages, future medical treatment, and a host of other reasons depending upon your case. If you have suffered an injury, please contact our car accident attorneys immediately so we may begin getting you the medical treatment and money you deserve.
Tags: Animal Attacks, Bike Accidents, Birth and Nursing Home Injuries, California Bar, Car Accidents, Defective Products, DUI Accidents, felonies, henderson auto accident, injured, insurance companies, intersection accident, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, las vegas accident, las vegas accident attorney, las vegas accident lawyer, las vegas auto accident, las vegas loan modification, Law Firm, Law Office of Josh Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, legal representation, Litigation, Mr. Harmon, north las vegas auto accident, Pedestrian Accidents, Slip and Fall Injuries, Spinal Cord Injury, TBI, Traumatic Brain Injury, Trial Attorney, Truck Accidents, Wrongful Death
Posted in Personal Injury | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009

Mr. Harmon earned his Juris Doctor degree from Washington and Lee School of Law and his Bachelor degree, with honors, from Franklin & Marshall College. While at Franklin & Marshall College, Mr. Harmon worked as a Symbolic Logic Tutor and Classical History Preceptor. Prior to practicing law, Mr. Harmon was a member of the United States Military and attended the United States Army Drill Sergeant’s School.
Mr. Harmon began his legal career at the law firm of Harmon & Davies, P.C. Corporate clients were attracted to his aggressive results-oriented approach to litigation. His notable clients included Mars, Inc., Kal Kan Foods, Masterfoods USA, Sysco, Uncle Ben’s, and Amoi Electronics. Mr. Harmon spent approximately twelve (12) years at Harmon & Davies honing his trial skills.
Mr. Harmon later departed and formed his own law firm concentrating in the area that he enjoyed most – helping injured individuals. He personally handles all aspects of each client’s case and relentlessly pushes each case towards the most favorable resolution.
Mr. Harmon is admitted to the Nevada Bar, California Bar, and Pennsylvania Bar. He is an active member of the Nevada Trial Lawyers Association. He enjoys outdoor activities and spending time with his two year old daughter.
Joshua L. Harmon, Esq. is the principal of the Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon. He concentrates his practice in personal injury law.
Tags: Bankruptcy, Bike Accidents, Birth and Nursing Home Injuries, California Bar, Car Accidents, Defective Products, faqs, felonies, filing a complaint, fixed mortgage, interest rate reduction, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, las vegas loan modification, Law Firm, Law Office of Josh Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, legal representation, Litigation, loan mod, Loan Modification, loan modifications, loan restructuring, Motorcycle Accidents, Mr. Harmon, Personal Injury, principle reduction, Traumatic Brain Injury, Wrongful Death
Posted in Videos | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009
Chapter 7
Liquidation Under the Bankruptcy Code
The chapter of the Bankruptcy Code providing for “liquidation,” ( i.e., the sale of a debtor’s nonexempt property and the distribution of the proceeds to creditors.)
a. Alternatives to Chapter 7
b. Background
c. Chapter 7 Eligibility
d. How Chapter 7 Works
e. Role of the Case Trustee
f. The Chapter 7 Discharge
——————————————————————————–
Alternatives to Chapter 7
Debtors should be aware that there are several alternatives to chapter 7 relief. For example, debtors who are engaged in business, including corporations, partnerships, and sole proprietorships, may prefer to remain in business and avoid liquidation. Such debtors should consider filing a petition under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. Under chapter 11, the debtor may seek an adjustment of debts, either by reducing the debt or by extending the time for repayment, or may seek a more comprehensive reorganization. Sole proprietorships may also be eligible for relief under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code.
In addition, individual debtors who have regular income may seek an adjustment of debts under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. A particular advantage of chapter 13 is that it provides individual debtors with an opportunity to save their homes from foreclosure by allowing them to “catch up” past due payments through a payment plan. Moreover, the court may dismiss a chapter 7 case filed by an individual whose debts are primarily consumer rather than business debts if the court finds that the granting of relief would be an abuse of chapter 7. 11 U.S.C. § 707(b).
If the debtor’s “current monthly income”(1) is more than the state median, the Bankruptcy Code requires application of a “means test” to determine whether the chapter 7 filing is presumptively abusive. Abuse is presumed if the debtor’s aggregate current monthly income over 5 years, net of certain statutorily allowed expenses, is more than (i) $10,950, or (ii) 25% of the debtor’s nonpriority unsecured debt, as long as that amount is at least $6,575. (2) The debtor may rebut a presumption of abuse only by a showing of special circumstances that justify additional expenses or adjustments of current monthly income. Unless the debtor overcomes the presumption of abuse, the case will generally be converted to chapter 13 (with the debtor’s consent) or will be dismissed. 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(1).
Debtors should also be aware that out-of-court agreements with creditors or debt counseling services may provide an alternative to a bankruptcy filing.
Background
A chapter 7 bankruptcy case does not involve the filing of a plan of repayment as in chapter 13. Instead, the bankruptcy trustee gathers and sells the debtor’s nonexempt assets and uses the proceeds of such assets to pay holders of claims (creditors) in accordance with the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. Part of the debtor’s property may be subject to liens and mortgages that pledge the property to other creditors. In addition, the Bankruptcy Code will allow the debtor to keep certain “exempt” property; but a trustee will liquidate the debtor’s remaining assets. Accordingly, potential debtors should realize that the filing of a petition under chapter 7 may result in the loss of property.
Chapter 7 Eligibility
To qualify for relief under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, the debtor may be an individual, a partnership, or a corporation or other business entity. 11 U.S.C. §§ 101(41), 109(b). Subject to the means test described above for individual debtors, relief is available under chapter 7 irrespective of the amount of the debtor’s debts or whether the debtor is solvent or insolvent. An individual cannot file under chapter 7 or any other chapter, however, if during the preceding 180 days a prior bankruptcy petition was dismissed due to the debtor’s willful failure to appear before the court or comply with orders of the court, or the debtor voluntarily dismissed the previous case after creditors sought relief from the bankruptcy court to recover property upon which they hold liens. 11 U.S.C. §§ 109(g), 362(d) and (e). In addition, no individual may be a debtor under chapter 7 or any chapter of the Bankruptcy Code unless he or she has, within 180 days before filing, received credit counseling from an approved credit counseling agency either in an individual or group briefing. 11 U.S.C. §§ 109, 111. There are exceptions in emergency situations or where the U.S. trustee (or bankruptcy administrator) has determined that there are insufficient approved agencies to provide the required counseling. If a debt management plan is developed during required credit counseling, it must be filed with the court.
One of the primary purposes of bankruptcy is to discharge certain debts to give an honest individual debtor a “fresh start.” The debtor has no liability for discharged debts. In a chapter 7 case, however, a discharge is only available to individual debtors, not to partnerships or corporations. 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(1). Although an individual chapter 7 case usually results in a discharge of debts, the right to a discharge is not absolute, and some types of debts are not discharged. Moreover, a bankruptcy discharge does not extinguish a lien on property.
How Chapter 7 Works
A chapter 7 case begins with the debtor filing a petition with the bankruptcy court serving the area where the individual lives or where the business debtor is organized or has its principal place of business or principal assets. (3) In addition to the petition, the debtor must also file with the court: (1) schedules of assets and liabilities; (2) a schedule of current income and expenditures; (3) a statement of financial affairs; and (4) a schedule of executory contracts and unexpired leases. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1007(b). Debtors must also provide the assigned case trustee with a copy of the tax return or transcripts for the most recent tax year as well as tax returns filed during the case (including tax returns for prior years that had not been filed when the case began). 11 U.S.C. § 521. Individual debtors with primarily consumer debts have additional document filing requirements. They must file: a certificate of credit counseling and a copy of any debt repayment plan developed through credit counseling; evidence of payment from employers, if any, received 60 days before filing; a statement of monthly net income and any anticipated increase in income or expenses after filing; and a record of any interest the debtor has in federal or state qualified education or tuition accounts. Id. A husband and wife may file a joint petition or individual petitions. 11 U.S.C. § 302(a). Even if filing jointly, a husband and wife are subject to all the document filing requirements of individual debtors. (The Official Forms may be purchased at legal stationery stores or downloaded from the internet at www.uscourts.gov/bkforms/index.html. They are not available from the court.)
The courts must charge a $245 case filing fee, a $39 miscellaneous administrative fee, and a $15 trustee surcharge. Normally, the fees must be paid to the clerk of the court upon filing. With the court’s permission, however, individual debtors may pay in installments. 28 U.S.C. § 1930(a); Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1006(b); Bankruptcy Court Miscellaneous Fee Schedule, Item 8. The number of installments is limited to four, and the debtor must make the final installment no later than 120 days after filing the petition. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1006. For cause shown, the court may extend the time of any installment, provided that the last installment is paid not later than 180 days after filing the petition. Id. The debtor may also pay the $39 administrative fee and the $15 trustee surcharge in installments. If a joint petition is filed, only one filing fee, one administrative fee, and one trustee surcharge are charged. Debtors should be aware that failure to pay these fees may result in dismissal of the case. 11 U.S.C. § 707(a).
If the debtor’s income is less than 150% of the poverty level (as defined in the Bankruptcy Code), and the debtor is unable to pay the chapter 7 fees even in installments, the court may waive the requirement that the fees be paid. 28 U.S.C. § 1930(f).
In order to complete the Official Bankruptcy Forms that make up the petition, statement of financial affairs, and schedules, the debtor must provide the following information:
1. A list of all creditors and the amount and nature of their claims;
2. The source, amount, and frequency of the debtor’s income;
3. A list of all of the debtor’s property; and
4. A detailed list of the debtor’s monthly living expenses, i.e., food, clothing, shelter, utilities, taxes, transportation, medicine, etc.
Married individuals must gather this information for their spouse regardless of whether they are filing a joint petition, separate individual petitions, or even if only one spouse is filing. In a situation where only one spouse files, the income and expenses of the non-filing spouse is required so that the court, the trustee and creditors can evaluate the household’s financial position.
Among the schedules that an individual debtor will file is a schedule of “exempt” property. The Bankruptcy Code allows an individual debtor (4) to protect some property from the claims of creditors because it is exempt under federal bankruptcy law or under the laws of the debtor’s home state. 11 U.S.C. § 522(b). Many states have taken advantage of a provision in the Bankruptcy Code that permits each state to adopt its own exemption law in place of the federal exemptions. In other jurisdictions, the individual debtor has the option of choosing between a federal package of exemptions or the exemptions available under state law. Thus, whether certain property is exempt and may be kept by the debtor is often a question of state law. The debtor should consult an attorney to determine the exemptions available in the state where the debtor lives.
Filing a petition under chapter 7 “automatically stays” (stops) most collection actions against the debtor or the debtor’s property. 11 U.S.C. § 362. But filing the petition does not stay certain types of actions listed under 11 U.S.C. § 362(b), and the stay may be effective only for a short time in some situations. The stay arises by operation of law and requires no judicial action. As long as the stay is in effect, creditors generally may not initiate or continue lawsuits, wage garnishments, or even telephone calls demanding payments. The bankruptcy clerk gives notice of the bankruptcy case to all creditors whose names and addresses are provided by the debtor.
Between 20 and 40 days after the petition is filed, the case trustee (described below) will hold a meeting of creditors. If the U.S. trustee or bankruptcy administrator (5) schedules the meeting at a place that does not have regular U.S. trustee or bankruptcy administrator staffing, the meeting may be held no more than 60 days after the order for relief. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2003(a). During this meeting, the trustee puts the debtor under oath, and both the trustee and creditors may ask questions. The debtor must attend the meeting and answer questions regarding the debtor’s financial affairs and property. 11 U.S.C. § 343. If a husband and wife have filed a joint petition, they both must attend the creditors’ meeting and answer questions. Within 10 days of the creditors’ meeting, the U.S. trustee will report to the court whether the case should be presumed to be an abuse under the means test described in 11 U.S.C. § 704(b).
It is important for the debtor to cooperate with the trustee and to provide any financial records or documents that the trustee requests. The Bankruptcy Code requires the trustee to ask the debtor questions at the meeting of creditors to ensure that the debtor is aware of the potential consequences of seeking a discharge in bankruptcy such as the effect on credit history, the ability to file a petition under a different chapter, the effect of receiving a discharge, and the effect of reaffirming a debt. Some trustees provide written information on these topics at or before the meeting to ensure that the debtor is aware of this information. In order to preserve their independent judgment, bankruptcy judges are prohibited from attending the meeting of creditors. 11 U.S.C. § 341(c).
In order to accord the debtor complete relief, the Bankruptcy Code allows the debtor to convert a chapter 7 case to case under chapter 11, 12 or 13 (6) as long as the debtor is eligible to be a debtor under the new chapter. However, a condition of the debtor’s voluntary conversion is that the case has not previously been converted to chapter 7 from another chapter. 11 U.S.C. § 706(a). Thus, the debtor will not be permitted to convert the case repeatedly from one chapter to another.
Role of the Case Trustee
When a chapter 7 petition is filed, the U.S. trustee (or the bankruptcy court in Alabama and North Carolina) appoints an impartial case trustee to administer the case and liquidate the debtor’s nonexempt assets. 11 U.S.C. §§ 701, 704. If all the debtor’s assets are exempt or subject to valid liens, the trustee will normally file a “no asset” report with the court, and there will be no distribution to unsecured creditors. Most chapter 7 cases involving individual debtors are no asset cases. But if the case appears to be an “asset” case at the outset, unsecured creditors (7) must file their claims with the court within 90 days after the first date set for the meeting of creditors. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3002(c). A governmental unit, however, has 180 days from the date the case is filed to file a claim. 11 U.S.C. § 502(b)(9). In the typical no asset chapter 7 case, there is no need for creditors to file proofs of claim because there will be no distribution. If the trustee later recovers assets for distribution to unsecured creditors, the Bankruptcy Court will provide notice to creditors and will allow additional time to file proofs of claim. Although a secured creditor does not need to file a proof of claim in a chapter 7 case to preserve its security interest or lien, there may be other reasons to file a claim. A creditor in a chapter 7 case who has a lien on the debtor’s property should consult an attorney for advice.
Commencement of a bankruptcy case creates an “estate.” The estate technically becomes the temporary legal owner of all the debtor’s property. It consists of all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property as of the commencement of the case, including property owned or held by another person if the debtor has an interest in the property. Generally speaking, the debtor’s creditors are paid from nonexempt property of the estate.
The primary role of a chapter 7 trustee in an asset case is to liquidate the debtor’s nonexempt assets in a manner that maximizes the return to the debtor’s unsecured creditors. The trustee accomplishes this by selling the debtor’s property if it is free and clear of liens (as long as the property is not exempt) or if it is worth more than any security interest or lien attached to the property and any exemption that the debtor holds in the property. The trustee may also attempt to recover money or property under the trustee’s “avoiding powers.” The trustee’s avoiding powers include the power to: set aside preferential transfers made to creditors within 90 days before the petition; undo security interests and other prepetition transfers of property that were not properly perfected under nonbankruptcy law at the time of the petition; and pursue nonbankruptcy claims such as fraudulent conveyance and bulk transfer remedies available under state law. In addition, if the debtor is a business, the bankruptcy court may authorize the trustee to operate the business for a limited period of time, if such operation will benefit creditors and enhance the liquidation of the estate. 11 U.S.C. § 721.
Section 726 of the Bankruptcy Code governs the distribution of the property of the estate. Under § 726, there are six classes of claims; and each class must be paid in full before the next lower class is paid anything. The debtor is only paid if all other classes of claims have been paid in full. Accordingly, the debtor is not particularly interested in the trustee’s disposition of the estate assets, except with respect to the payment of those debts which for some reason are not dischargeable in the bankruptcy case. The individual debtor’s primary concerns in a chapter 7 case are to retain exempt property and to receive a discharge that covers as many debts as possible.
The Chapter 7 Discharge
A discharge releases individual debtors from personal liability for most debts and prevents the creditors owed those debts from taking any collection actions against the debtor. Because a chapter 7 discharge is subject to many exceptions, though, debtors should consult competent legal counsel before filing to discuss the scope of the discharge. Generally, excluding cases that are dismissed or converted, individual debtors receive a discharge in more than 99 percent of chapter 7 cases. In most cases, unless a party in interest files a complaint objecting to the discharge or a motion to extend the time to object, the bankruptcy court will issue a discharge order relatively early in the case – generally, 60 to 90 days after the date first set for the meeting of creditors. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 4004(c).
The grounds for denying an individual debtor a discharge in a chapter 7 case are narrow and are construed against the moving party. Among other reasons, the court may deny the debtor a discharge if it finds that the debtor: failed to keep or produce adequate books or financial records; failed to explain satisfactorily any loss of assets; committed a bankruptcy crime such as perjury; failed to obey a lawful order of the bankruptcy court; fraudulently transferred, concealed, or destroyed property that would have become property of the estate; or failed to complete an approved instructional course concerning financial management. 11 U.S.C. § 727; Fed. R. Bankr. P. 4005.
Secured creditors may retain some rights to seize property securing an underlying debt even after a discharge is granted. Depending on individual circumstances, if a debtor wishes to keep certain secured property (such as an automobile), he or she may decide to “reaffirm” the debt. A reaffirmation is an agreement between the debtor and the creditor that the debtor will remain liable and will pay all or a portion of the money owed, even though the debt would otherwise be discharged in the bankruptcy. In return, the creditor promises that it will not repossess or take back the automobile or other property so long as the debtor continues to pay the debt.
If the debtor decides to reaffirm a debt, he or she must do so before the discharge is entered. The debtor must sign a written reaffirmation agreement and file it with the court. 11 U.S.C. § 524(c). The Bankruptcy Code requires that reaffirmation agreements contain an extensive set of disclosures described in 11 U.S.C. § 524(k). Among other things, the disclosures must advise the debtor of the amount of the debt being reaffirmed and how it is calculated and that reaffirmation means that the debtor’s personal liability for that debt will not be discharged in the bankruptcy. The disclosures also require the debtor to sign and file a statement of his or her current income and expenses which shows that the balance of income paying expenses is sufficient to pay the reaffirmed debt. If the balance is not enough to pay the debt to be reaffirmed, there is a presumption of undue hardship, and the court may decide not to approve the reaffirmation agreement. Unless the debtor is represented by an attorney, the bankruptcy judge must approve the reaffirmation agreement.
If the debtor was represented by an attorney in connection with the reaffirmation agreement, the attorney must certify in writing that he or she advised the debtor of the legal effect and consequences of the agreement, including a default under the agreement. The attorney must also certify that the debtor was fully informed and voluntarily made the agreement and that reaffirmation of the debt will not create an undue hardship for the debtor or the debtor’s dependants. 11 U.S.C. § 524(k). The Bankruptcy Code requires a reaffirmation hearing if the debtor has not been represented by an attorney during the negotiating of the agreement, or if the court disapproves the reaffirmation agreement.11 U.S.C. § 524(d) and (m). The debtor may repay any debt voluntarily, however, whether or not a reaffirmation agreement exists. 11 U.S.C. § 524(f).
An individual receives a discharge for most of his or her debts in a chapter 7 bankruptcy case. A creditor may no longer initiate or continue any legal or other action against the debtor to collect a discharged debt. But not all of an individual’s debts are discharged in chapter 7. Debts not discharged include debts for alimony and child support, certain taxes, debts for certain educational benefit overpayments or loans made or guaranteed by a governmental unit, debts for willful and malicious injury by the debtor to another entity or to the property of another entity, debts for death or personal injury caused by the debtor’s operation of a motor vehicle while the debtor was intoxicated from alcohol or other substances, and debts for certain criminal restitution orders.11 U.S.C. § 523(a). The debtor will continue to be liable for these types of debts to the extent that they are not paid in the chapter 7 case. Debts for money or property obtained by false pretenses, debts for fraud or defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity, and debts for willful and malicious injury by the debtor to another entity or to the property of another entity will be discharged unless a creditor timely files and prevails in an action to have such debts declared nondischargeable. 11 U.S.C. § 523(c); Fed. R. Bankr. P. 4007(c).
The court may revoke a chapter 7 discharge on the request of the trustee, a creditor, or the U.S. trustee if the discharge was obtained through fraud by the debtor, if the debtor acquired property that is property of the estate and knowingly and fraudulently failed to report the acquisition of such property or to surrender the property to the trustee, or if the debtor (without a satisfactory explanation) makes a material misstatement or fails to provide documents or other information in connection with an audit of the debtor’s case. 11 U.S.C. § 727(d).
——————————————————————————–
NOTES
1. The “current monthly income” received by the debtor is a defined term in the Bankruptcy Code and means the average monthly income received over the six calendar months before commencement of the bankruptcy case, including regular contributions to household expenses from nondebtors and including income from the debtor’s spouse if the petition is a joint petition, but not including social security income or certain payments made because the debtor is the victim of certain crimes. 11 U.S.C. § 101(10A). return to text
2. To determine whether a presumption of abuse arises, all individual debtors with primarily consumer debts who file a chapter 7 case must complete Official Bankruptcy Form B22A, entitled “Statement of Current Monthly Income and Means Test Calculation – For Use in Chapter 7.” (The Official Forms may be purchased at legal stationery stores or downloaded from the internet at www.uscourts.gov/bkforms/index.html. They are not available from the court.) return to text
3. An involuntary chapter 7 case may be commenced under certain circumstances by a petition filed by creditors holding claims against the debtor. 11 U.S.C. § 303. return to text
4. Each debtor in a joint case (both husband and wife) can claim exemptions under the federal bankruptcy laws. 11 U.S.C. § 522(m). return to text
5. In North Carolina and Alabama, bankruptcy administrators perform similar functions that U.S. trustees perform in the remaining 48 states. These duties include establishing a panel of private trustees to serve as trustees in chapter 7 cases and supervising the administration of cases and trustees in cases under chapters 7, 11, 12, and 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. The bankruptcy administrator program is administered by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, while the U.S. trustee program is administered by the Department of Justice. For purposes of this publication, references to U.S. trustees are also applicable to bankruptcy administrators. return to text
6. A fee is charged for converting, on request of the debtor, a case under chapter 7 to a case under chapter 11. The fee charged is the difference between the filing fee for a chapter 7 and the filing fee for a chapter 11. 28 U.S.C. § 1930(a). Currently, the difference is $755. Id. There is no fee for converting from chapter 7 to chapter 13. return to text
7. Unsecured debts generally may be defined as those for which the extension of credit was based purely upon an evaluation by the creditor of the debtor’s ability to pay, as opposed to secured debts, for which the extension of credit was based upon the creditor’s right to seize collateral on default, in addition to the debtor’s ability to pay. return to text
Source: http://www.uscourts.gov/bankruptcycourts/bankruptcybasics/process.html
Tags: Bankruptcy, California Bar, DUI Accidents, filing a complaint, fixed loan, fixed mortgage, insurance companies, interest rate reduction, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, las vegas loan modification, Law Office of Josh Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, lawsuit, Motorcycle Accidents, Mr. Harmon, Paralysis, Pedestrian Accidents, principle reduction, short sale, Slip and Fall Injuries
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009
| July 28, 2009
HUD Secretary Donovan Announces New FHA-Making Home Affordable Loan Modification Guidelines
New FHA guidelines projected to help thousands avoid foreclosure per year WASHINGTON – U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan today announced the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) has implemented changes to its loan modification program to ensure consistency with the Obama Administration’s Home Affordable Modification Program. By August 15, FHA borrowers will be able to significantly reduce their monthly mortgage payments by seeking a loan modification through their current mortgage company or loan servicer under the new FHA-Home Affordable Modification Program (FHA-HAMP). “Today, we’re bringing another important tool to the table to help struggling families who are desperate to keep their homes,” said Donovan. “Tens of thousands of FHA borrowers will now be able to modify their mortgages in the same manner as so many others who are taking advantage of the Administration’’s Making Home Affordable program. This is just the latest tool we are providing to help homeowners prevent foreclosures through the Making Home Affordable program. Earlier this month we announced an expansion of the Home Affordable Refinance Program to borrowers who are up to 125 percent underwater. Together, these actions will significantly increase the help available to homeowners.” The Helping Families Save Their Homes Act of 2009, signed into law on May 20, allows FHA to give qualified FHA-insured borrowers the opportunity to reduce their monthly mortgage payment by modifying the mortgage through FHA-HAMP. FHA released the program’s implementation guidelines today. FHA expects all servicers to implement the changes by August 15. The program permanently reduces a family’s monthly mortgage payment through the use of a partial claim, which defers the repayment of mortgage principal through an interest-free subordinate mortgage that is not due until the first mortgage is paid off. FHA has used the partial claim option in the past, which allows a lender to advance funds on behalf of a borrower, to reinstate a delinquent loan that was up to 12 months delinquent. Now, this program will allow HUD to bring the borrower’s payment down to an affordable level. This will be accomplished by bringing the mortgage current, buying down the loan by up to 30 percent of the unpaid principal balance and deferring these amounts in a partial claim. FHA will pay an incentive to loan servicers for each FHA loan modified under this program. A Mortgagee Letter, along with detailed requirements for the FHA-Home Affordable Modification Program, was distributed to all FHA lenders today. The implementation of this program will further the Obama Administration’s efforts to stabilize the housing market by helping homeowners to stay current on their mortgages and stay in their homes, therefore preventing the destructive impact of foreclosures on families and communities. Making Home Affordable, a comprehensive plan to stabilize the U.S. housing market, was first announced by the Obama Administration on February 18. More than 200,000 trial loan modifications are already underway, tens of thousands of refinancings have closed, and informational mailings about the program have been sent to more than one million borrowers who may be eligible. FHA borrowers who are experiencing difficulty making their mortgage payments should contact their loan servicer or HUD’s National Servicing Center at (888) 297-8685 to determine if they qualify for the FHA-Home Affordable Modification Program. The Mortgagee Letter, with detailed information about the program, is available on the HUD website. Non-FHA borrowers can find information about the Obama Administration’s Making Home Affordable program at www.makinghomeaffordable.gov. ### HUD is the nation’s housing agency committed to sustaining homeownership; creating affordable housing opportunities for low-income Americans; and supporting the homeless, elderly, people with disabilities and people living with AIDS. The Department also promotes economic and community development and enforces the nation’s fair housing laws. More information about HUD and its programs is available on the Internet at www.hud.gov and espanol.hud.gov. |
Source: http://www.makinghomeaffordable.gov/pr_07302009.html
Tags: Bankruptcy, fixed loan, fixed mortgage, interest rate reduction, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, las vegas loan modification, Law Firm, Law Office of Josh Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, legal representation, loan mod, loan restructuring, making home affordable, Mr. Harmon, Slip and Fall Injuries, Trial Attorney
Posted in Loan Modification | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009
| U.S. Foreclosure Market Report Q1 2009 Heat Map. (PRNewsFoto/RealtyTrac Inc.) IRVINE, CA UNITED STATES |
|||
U.S. Foreclosure Activity Up 24 Percent From Q1 2008
March Activity Up 17 Percent From February, 46 Percent From March 2008
IRVINE, Calif., April 16 /PRNewswire/ -- RealtyTrac(R)
(http://www.realtytrac.com), the leading online marketplace for foreclosure
properties, today released its U.S. Foreclosure Market Report(TM) for Q1
2009, which shows that foreclosure filings -- default notices, auction sale
notices and bank repossessions -- were reported on 803,489 properties in
the first quarter, a 9 percent increase from the previous quarter and an
increase of nearly 24 percent from Q1 2008. One in every 159 U.S. housing
units received a foreclosure filing during the quarter.
Foreclosure filings were reported on 341,180 properties in March, a 17
percent increase from the previous month and a 46 percent increase from
March 2008. The March and Q1 2009 totals were the highest monthly and
quarterly totals since RealtyTrac began issuing its report in January 2005
despite a decrease in bank repossessions (REOs), which were down 13 percent
from the fourth quarter of 2008 and 3 percent from February totals.
"In the month of March we saw a record level of foreclosure activity --
the number of households that received a foreclosure filing was more than
12 percent higher than the next highest month on record. Since much of this
activity was in new foreclosure actions, it suggests that many lenders and
servicers were holding off on executing foreclosures due to industry
moratoria and legislative delays," said James J. Saccacio, chief executive
officer of RealtyTrac. "It's also likely that the drop in REO activity can
be attributed to these processing delays, rather than to any of the
foreclosure prevention programs currently in place. It's very likely that
we'll see the number of REOs increase again now that most of the moratoria
have been lifted."
"On a positive note, it appears that demand is up in some of the
harder-hit areas, particularly on bank-owned REO properties that first time
homebuyers and investors see as bargains," Saccacio continued. "But it's
unlikely that this increased demand will be enough to offset the growing
number of foreclosures in the pipeline, accelerated by rising unemployment
rates."
Nevada, Arizona, California post top state foreclosure rates in first
quarter
Nevada continued to document the nation's highest state foreclosure
rate in the first quarter, with one in every 27 housing units receiving a
foreclosure filing -- more than five times the national average.
Foreclosure filings were reported on 41,296 Nevada properties during the
quarter, an increase of 19 percent from the previous quarter and an
increase of nearly 111 percent from Q1 2008. Bank repossessions in Nevada
were down 3 percent from the previous quarter, but defaults increased 27
percent and auction sale notices increased 35 percent.
Arizona posted the nation's second highest state foreclosure rate for
the first quarter, with one in every 54 housing units receiving a
foreclosure filing, and California posted the nation's third highest state
foreclosure rate, with one in every 58 housing units receiving a
foreclosure filing.
Other states with foreclosure rates ranking among the top 10 in the
first quarter were Florida, Illinois, Michigan, Georgia, Idaho, Utah and
Oregon.
Five states account for nearly 60 percent of nation's first quarter
total
California, Florida, Arizona, Nevada and Illinois accounted for nearly
60 percent of the nation's foreclosure activity in the first quarter, with
479,516 properties receiving foreclosure filings in the five states
combined.
With 230,915 properties receiving foreclosure filings during the
quarter, California accounted for nearly 29 percent of the nation's total.
The state's foreclosure activity increased 35 percent from the previous
quarter and 36 percent from Q1 2008, and the first-quarter total was
state's highest quarterly total since RealtyTrac began issuing its report
in the first quarter of 2005.
Despite a 12 percent decrease from the previous quarter, Florida's
first quarter total was still second highest in the nation. Foreclosure
filings were reported on 119,220 Florida properties, a 36 percent increase
from the first quarter of 2008. The state posted the nation's fourth
highest state foreclosure rate during the quarter, with one in every 73
housing units receiving a foreclosure filing.
Foreclosure filings were reported on 49,119 Arizona properties in the
first quarter of 2009, the third highest total among the states, and 41,296
Nevada properties received a foreclosure filing in the first quarter of
2009, the fourth highest total among the states.
Illinois posted the nation's fifth highest total, with 38,966
properties receiving a foreclosure filing during the first quarter -- a 32
percent increase from the previous quarter and a 68 percent increase from
the first quarter of 2008. With one in every 135 housing units receiving a
foreclosure filing, the state's foreclosure rate also ranked fifth highest
among the states.
Rounding out the states with the 10 highest foreclosure activity totals
in Q1 2009 were Michigan, Ohio, Georgia, Texas and Virginia.
Report methodology
The RealtyTrac U.S. Foreclosure Market Report provides a count of the
total number of properties with at least one foreclosure filing reported
during the month or quarter -- broken out by type of filing at the state
and national level. Data is also available at the individual county level
for both Q1 2009 and March 2009. Data is collected from more than 2,200
counties nationwide, and those counties account for more than 90 percent of
the U.S. population. RealtyTrac's report incorporates documents filed in
all three phases of foreclosure: Default -- Notice of Default (NOD) and Lis
Pendens (LIS); Auction -- Notice of Trustee Sale and Notice of Foreclosure
Sale (NTS and NFS); and Real Estate Owned, or REO properties (that have
been foreclosed on and repurchased by a bank). If more than one foreclosure
document is filed against a property during the month or quarter, only the
most recent filing is counted in the report.
U.S. Foreclosure Market Data by State - Q1 2009
Properties with Foreclosure Filings
Rate State
Rank Name NOD LIS NTS NFS
-- U.S. 156,933 149,852 225,752 80,409
35 Alabama 0 0 2,291 0
33 Alaska 0 0 349 0
2 Arizona 21 0 35,079 0
20 Arkansas 536 0 2,973 0
3 California 124,875 0 60,256 0
12 Colorado 7 0 9,186 0
15 Connecticut 0 4,256 16 461
31 Delaware 0 1 6 607
District of Columbia 274 0 400 0
4 Florida 0 70,114 183 33,035
7 Georgia 1 0 18,938 0
26 Hawaii 300 0 1,094 0
8 Idaho 2,141 0 1,954 0
5 Illinois 0 19,848 120 11,612
14 Indiana 0 4,588 93 4,523
38 Iowa 0 0 718 0
32 Kansas 0 335 16 915
42 Kentucky 0 116 28 1,003
40 Louisiana 0 9 19 1,507
39 Maine 206 81 281 144
16 Maryland 0 6,547 21 1,584
27 Massachusetts 0 4,282 11 1,401
6 Michigan 791 0 21,863 0
25 Minnesota 8 0 3,750 0
44 Mississippi 0 0 630 0
28 Missouri 32 0 4,003 0
47 Montana 0 0 23 0
48 Nebraska 0 161 10 18
1 Nevada 20,534 0 10,320 0
19 New Hampshire 0 0 1,648 0
24 New Jersey 0 7,254 16 2,771
41 New Mexico 0 294 4 266
37 New York 0 7,647 15 2,296
36 North Carolina 514 0 2,253 0
45 North Dakota 0 0 1 44
11 Ohio 0 12,279 137 10,398
34 Oklahoma 802 0 1,249 0
10 Oregon 3,166 0 5,465 0
30 Pennsylvania 0 4,477 27 4,277
18 Rhode Island 0 0 830 0
23 South Carolina 0 3,196 29 1,372
49 South Dakota 0 0 1 92
17 Tennessee 1 0 5,753 0
29 Texas 34 0 14,564 0
9 Utah 2,396 0 1,982 0
50 Vermont 0 0 1 0
13 Virginia 294 0 9,858 0
21 Washington 0 0 6,810 0
46 West Virginia 0 0 285 0
22 Wisconsin 0 4,367 67 2,083
43 Wyoming 0 0 126 0
1/every % change % change
Rate State X HU from from
Rank Name REO Total (rate) Q4 08 Q1 08
-- U.S. 190,543 803,489 159 9.16 23.63
35 Alabama 1,378 3,669 582 74.71 115.82*
33 Alaska 202 551 512 -24.31 14.55
2 Arizona 14,019 49,119 54 6.22 79.24
20 Arkansas 1,072 4,581 281 -3.23 22.09
3 California 45,784 230,915 58 35.13 35.97
12 Colorado 3,412 12,605 169 -13.84 -33.64
15 Connecticut 1,143 5,876 245 -6.76 -23.01
31 Delaware 214 828 469 2.60 54.19
District of Columbia 163 837 340 4.23 -23.14
4 Florida 15,888 119,220 73 -12.19 35.64
7 Georgia 9,669 28,608 138 10.66 0.37
26 Hawaii 160 1,554 326 25.32 318.87
8 Idaho 198 4,293 147 15.56 137.18*
5 Illinois 7,386 38,966 135 31.66 67.85
14 Indiana 3,253 12,457 223 -6.01 -10.61
38 Iowa 854 1,572 846 -8.92 0.38
32 Kansas 1,285 2,551 478 35.55 82.74
42 Kentucky 588 1,735 1,099 -3.29 9.67
40 Louisiana 436 1,971 943 15.87 1.70
39 Maine 64 776 898 -14.25 32.20
16 Maryland 1,137 9,289 250 -7.39 -18.47
27 Massachusetts 2,499 8,193 332 -9.16 -49.94
6 Michigan 10,530 33,184 136 -1.98 12.32
25 Minnesota 3,415 7,173 321 7.83 69.53
44 Mississippi 138 768 1,634 57.38 67.69*
28 Missouri 3,256 7,291 363 -13.75t -17.55t
47 Montana 130 153 2,847 -44.96 -63.66
48 Nebraska 33 222 3,517 29.07 -70.08
1 Nevada 10,442 41,296 27 19.13 110.75
19 New Hampshire 577 2,225 267 4.26 24.44
24 New Jersey 1,668 11,709 299 -29.17 -10.65
41 New Mexico 253 817 1,055 6.80 -30.88
37 New York 1,059 11,017 721 31.69 -23.37
36 North Carolina 3,221 5,988 689 -19.69 -41.77
45 North Dakota 76 121 2,567 -4.72 142.00*
11 Ohio 8,781 31,595 160 -3.14 1.10
34 Oklahoma 861 2,912 557 1.68 -10.10
10 Oregon 1,916 10,547 153 29.41 151.00*
30 Pennsylvania 3,016 11,797 464 5.36 99.92*
18 Rhode Island 881 1,711 264 -23.79 8.22
23 South Carolina 2,419 7,016 288 27.10 261.84*
49 South Dakota 3 96 3,721 -20.66 50.00
17 Tennessee 4,608 10,362 263 2.03 -16.36tt
29 Texas 10,661 25,259 373 14.87 -25.03
9 Utah 1,765 6,143 151 12.47 86.77
50 Vermont 20 21 14,830 -59.62 600.00*
13 Virginia 4,573 14,725 222 -10.73t 11.97t
21 Washington 2,903 9,713 283 2.69 46.32
46 West Virginia 50 335 2,635 95.91 134.27
22 Wisconsin 2,393 8,910 287 57.70 57.09*
43 Wyoming 91 217 1,117 -11.07 32.32
*Actual increase may not be as high due to data collection changes or
Improvements
t Collection of some records previously classified as NOD in this state
was discontinued starting in January 2009
tt Collection of some records previously classified as NOD in this state
was discontinued starting in September 2008
U.S. Foreclosure Rates Heat Map - Q1 2009
(Photo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20090416/LA99849)
U.S. Foreclosure Market Data by State - March 2009
Properties with Foreclosure Filings
Rate State
Rank Name NOD LIS NTS NFS
-- U.S. 72,790 58,741 104,856 33,042
29 Alabama 0 0 1,655 0
33 Alaska 0 0 155 0
3 Arizona 3 0 14,012 0
18 Arkansas 234 0 1,203 0
2 California 58,858 0 34,575 0
10 Colorado 2 0 3,703 0
13 Connecticut 0 2,187 0 158
28 Delaware 0 0 0 339
District of Columbia 98 0 153 0
4 Florida 0 26,964 0 13,566
5 Georgia 0 0 8,136 0
21 Hawaii 149 0 509 0
7 Idaho 1,133 0 726 0
8 Illinois 0 7,362 0 4,740
14 Indiana 0 1,964 1 1,587
40 Iowa 0 0 181 0
34 Kansas 0 170 0 305
42 Kentucky 0 15 0 398
37 Louisiana 0 7 0 740
41 Maine 0 81 0 144
20 Maryland 0 2,210 0 732
31 Mass. 0 1,708 0 456
9 Michigan 0 0 8,286 0
24 Minnesota 2 0 1,929 0
46 Mississippi 0 0 179 0
30 Missouri 3 0 1,630 0
48 Montana 0 0 6 0
44 Nebraska 0 161 0 6
1 Nevada 10,351 0 5,055 0
23 New Hampshire 0 0 617 0
25 New Jersey 0 2,748 0 1,098
39 New Mexico 0 134 0 93
36 New York 0 3,459 0 721
38 North Carolina 213 0 653 0
47 North Dakota 0 0 0 22
11 Ohio 0 4,828 0 4,447
35 Oklahoma 324 0 580 0
12 Oregon 28 0 2,766 0
32 Pennsylvania 0 1,777 0 1,891
22 Rhode Island 0 0 300 0
26 South Carolina 0 1,069 0 485
49 South Dakota 0 0 0 24
16 Tennessee 0 0 2,496 0
27 Texas 16 0 7,151 0
6 Utah 1,372 0 1,013 0
50 Vermont 0 0 0 0
15 Virginia 4 0 3,971 0
17 Washington 0 0 3,031 0
45 West Virginia 0 0 135 0
19 Wisconsin 0 1,897 0 1,090
43 Wyoming 0 0 49 0
% change % change
Rate State from from
Rank Name REO Total Feb 09 Mar 08
-- U.S. 71,751 341,180 17.46 46.37
29 Alabama 605 2,260 216.97* 248.23*
33 Alaska 69 224 10.34 16.67
3 Arizona 4,861 18,876 4.18 105.20
18 Arkansas 486 1,923 19.00 58.93
2 California 14,352 107,785 33.44 66.56
10 Colorado 1,875 5,580 32.26 -9.71
13 Connecticut 540 2,885 29.95 35.70
28 Delaware 92 431 57.88 124.48
District of Columbia 77 328 -13.46 6.84
4 Florida 6,601 47,131 1.60 55.78
5 Georgia 5,230 13,366 31.23 20.99
21 Hawaii 66 724 34.82 503.33
7 Idaho 62 1,921 8.90 192.39*
8 Illinois 3,296 15,398 8.30 78.57
14 Indiana 1,574 5,126 16.34 0.14
40 Iowa 305 486 -16.06 -5.08
34 Kansas 369 844 -27.92 18.87
42 Kentucky 218 631 5.52 -8.68
37 Louisiana 200 947 39.68 51.28
41 Maine 24 249 -4.60 27.04
20 Maryland 392 3,334 4.97 -22.01
31 Mass. 508 2,672 -9.12 -52.05
9 Michigan 4,131 12,417 -1.17 30.79
24 Minnesota 1,146 3,077 19.54 132.58
46 Mississippi 42 221 -24.83 17.55
30 Missouri 1,082 2,715 -13.23 -19.39t
48 Montana 56 62 14.81 -59.74
44 Nebraska 16 183 1307.69 -33.21
1 Nevada 4,443 19,849 25.76 159.16
23 New Hampshire 207 824 11.50 99.03
25 New Jersey 724 4,570 39.37 1.96
39 New Mexico 119 346 -7.24 1.17
36 New York 329 4,509 10.84 -11.38
38 North Carolina 1,111 1,977 -3.04 -40.05
47 North Dakota 31 53 43.24 562.50*
11 Ohio 3,336 12,611 12.29 11.87
35 Oklahoma 215 1,119 8.64 -22.67
12 Oregon 594 3,388 -6.10 107.47*
32 Pennsylvania 1,275 4,943 17.92 70.45*
22 Rhode Island 333 633 54.77 59.05
26 South Carolina 812 2,366 -4.33 153.86*
49 South Dakota 1 25 -21.88 56.25
16 Tennessee 1,925 4,421 19.78 13.16tt
27 Texas 3,449 10,616 0.85 -0.79
6 Utah 700 3,085 70.91 150.81
50 Vermont 4 4 -63.64 100.00*
15 Virginia 1,780 5,755 19.32 16.66t
17 Washington 1,205 4,236 37.71 89.62
45 West Virginia 27 162 45.95 138.24
19 Wisconsin 825 3,812 27.66 83.89*
43 Wyoming 31 80 -1.23 -2.44
*Actual increase may not be as high due to data collection changes or
Improvements
t Collection of some records previously classified as NOD in this state
was discontinued starting in January 2009
tt Collection of some records previously classified as NOD in this state
was discontinued starting in September 2008
About RealtyTrac Inc.
RealtyTrac (http://www.realtytrac.com) is the leading online marketplace of
foreclosure properties, with more than 1.5 million default, auction and
bank-owned listings from over 2,200 U.S. counties, along with detailed
property, loan and home sales data. Hosting more than 3 million unique
monthly visitors, RealtyTrac provides innovative technology solutions and
practical education resources to facilitate buying, selling and investing
in real estate. RealtyTrac's foreclosure data has also been used by the
Federal Reserve, FBI, U.S. Senate Joint Economic Committee and Banking
Committee, U.S. Treasury Department, and numerous state housing and banking
departments to help evaluate foreclosure trends and address policy issues
related to foreclosures.
|
Tags: Bankruptcy, California Bar, fixed loan, fixed mortgage, insurance companies, interest rate reduction, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, legal representation, Loan Modification, making home affordable, Mr. Harmon, principle reduction, short sale
Posted in Loan Modification | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009
Judicial foreclosure: In the absence of a power of sale clause in the loan document, a lender may sue the borrower to obtain a court order to foreclose and sell the property.
Non-judicial foreclosure is pursued when a power of sale clause is present in the loan document. If the clause contains instructions as to the time, place, and terms of sale, that procedure must be followed. If not, a notice of sale must be published weekly for four consecutive weeks in a newspaper published in the county in which the property is located. If no newspaper is published in the subject county, the notice shall be published in a newspaper in an adjoining county.
The sale may not be held until 30 days from the last date of publication, and shall be held between the hours of 11:00 AM and 4:00 PM at the courthouse door as a public auction for cash to the highest bidder.
Right of redemption: The owner has 12 months in which to redeem the property. Deficiency judgments are permitted.
Nevada
Judicial Foreclosure-Sometimes
Non-Judicial Foreclosure-Yes, most common
Security Instruments-Deed of Trust, Mortgage
Right of Redemption-judicial foreclosure only
Deficiency Judgments-Yes
Time Frame-Usually 120 days
Arizona
Judicial Foreclosure-Sometimes
Non-Judicial Foreclosure-Yes, most common
Security Instruments-Deed of Trust, Mortgage
Right of Redemption-No
Deficiency Judgments-Varies
Time Frame-Usually 90 days
California
Judicial Foreclosure-Sometimes
Non-Judicial Foreclosure-Yes, most common
Security Instruments-Deed of Trust, Mortgage
Right of Redemption-Yes, judicial foreclosure only
Deficiency Judgments-Yes, judicial foreclosure only
Time Frame-111 days or more
New York
Judicial Foreclosure-Yes
Non-Judicial Foreclosure-Yes, but almost never used
Security Instruments-Deed of Trust, Mortgage
Right of Redemption-No
Deficiency Judgments-Yes
Time Frame-Usually 12-19 months
Nevada
Judicial Foreclosure-Sometimes
Non-Judicial Foreclosure-Yes, most common
Security Instruments-Deed of Trust, Mortgage
Right of Redemption-judicial foreclosure only
Deficiency Judgments-Yes
Time Frame-Usually 120 days
Pennsylvania
Judicial Foreclosure-Yes
Non-Judicial Foreclosure-No
Security Instruments-Mortgage
Right of Redemption-No
Deficiency Judgment-Yes
Time Frame-Usually 90 days
Tags: Bankruptcy, fixed loan, fixed mortgage, interest rate reduction, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, las vegas loan modification attorney, Law Office of Josh Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, lawsuit, loan mod, Loan Modification, loan modifications, loan restructuring, making home affordable, Mr. Harmon, Nevada State Foreclosure Laws, state foreclosure laws
Posted in Loan Modification | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009
This law establishes a Foreclosure Mediation Program for owner-occupied residential properties that are subject to foreclosure notices – formally known as a Notice of Default and Election to Sell – filed on or after July 1, 2009.
Mediation is an alternative method to help parties resolve disputes by agreement with the help of trained mediators.
Form to Request Mediation (Instructions included)
Description:
Assembly Bill No. 149–Assemblymen Buckley, Oceguera, Conklin,
Leslie, Smith; Aizley, Anderson, Atkinson, Bobzien,
Claborn, Denis, Dondero Loop, Goicoechea, Grady,
Hambrick, Hardy, Hogan, Horne, Kihuen, Kirkpatrick,
Koivisto, Manendo, Mastroluca, McClain, Munford,
Ohrenschall, Parnell, Pierce, Segerblom, Settelmeyer,
Spiegel and Stewart
Joint Sponsors: Senators Horsford; and Coffin
CHAPTER……….
AN ACT relating to real property; revising provisions governing
foreclosures on property; providing for mediation under
certain circumstances; providing for the imposition of a fee
for mediation; and providing other matters properly relating
thereto.
Legislative Counsel’s Digest:
Existing law sets forth procedures governing foreclosures on real property upon
default. A trustee under a deed of trust has the power to sell the property to which
the deed of trust applies, subject to certain restrictions. (NRS 107.080, 107.085)
Section 1
sale with respect to owner-occupied housing by providing a grantor of a deed of
trust or the person who holds the title of record with the right to request mediation
under which he may receive a loan modification. Once mediation is requested, no
further action may be taken to exercise the power of sale until the completion of the
mediation. Each mediation must be conducted by a senior justice, judge, hearing
master or other designee pursuant to rules adopted by the Nevada Supreme Court,
and a fee of not more than $85 per hour may be charged and collected for the
mediation.
respect to owner-occupied housing by revising the period in which a deficiency in
performance or payment under the trust agreement may be made good before the
trustee may exercise that power. Similarly,
the trustee’s power of sale with respect to owner-occupied housing by revising the
manner in which service of notice that a person is in danger of losing his home
must be made. In addition,
Court to adopt rules providing for voluntary mediation with respect to a
homeowner who is not in default but is at risk of default.
of this bill establishes additional restrictions on the trustee’s power of
Section 2 of this bill also restricts the trustee’s power of sale withsection 3 of this bill restrictssection 4 of this bill authorizes the Nevada Supreme
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN
SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
thereto a new section to read as follows:
Chapter 107 of NRS is hereby amended by adding
. In addition to the requirements of NRS 107.085, theexercise of the power of sale pursuant to NRS 107.080 with respect
– 2 –
-
to any trust agreement which concerns owner-occupied housing is
subject to the provisions of this section.
. The trustee shall not exercise a power of sale pursuant to
NRS 107.080 unless the trustee:
(a) Includes with the notice of default and election to sell
which is mailed to the grantor or the person who holds the title of
record as required by subsection 3 of NRS 107.080:
(1) Contact information which the grantor or the person
who holds the title of record may use to reach a person with
authority to negotiate a loan modification on behalf of the
beneficiary of the deed of trust;
(2) Contact information for at least one local housing
counseling agency approved by the United States Department of
Housing and Urban Development; and
(3) A form upon which the grantor or the person who holds
the title of record may indicate his election to enter into mediation
or to waive mediation and one envelope addressed to the trustee
and one envelope addressed to the Mediation Administrator,
which the grantor or the person who holds the title of record may
use to comply with the provisions of subsection 3;
(b) Serves a copy of the notice upon the Mediation
Administrator; and
(c) Causes to be recorded in the office of the recorder of the
county in which the trust property, or some part thereof, is
situated:
(1) The certificate provided to the trustee by the Mediation
Administrator pursuant to subsection 3 or 6 which provides that
no mediation is required in the matter; or
(2) The certificate provided to the trustee by the Mediation
Administrator pursuant to subsection 7 which provides that
mediation has been completed in the matter.
. The grantor or the person who holds the title of recordshall, not later than 30 days after service of the notice upon him in
the manner required by NRS 107.080, complete the form required
by subparagraph (3) of paragraph (a) of subsection 2 and return
the form to the trustee by certified mail, return receipt requested.
If the grantor or the person who holds the title of record indicates
on the form his election to enter into mediation, the trustee shall
notify the beneficiary of the deed of trust and every other person
with an interest as defined in NRS 107.090, by certified mail,
return receipt requested, of the election of the grantor or the
person who holds the title of record to enter into mediation and
file the form with the Mediation Administrator, who shall assign
– 3 –
-
the matter to a senior justice, judge, hearing master or other
designee and schedule the matter for mediation. No further action
may be taken to exercise the power of sale until the completion of
the mediation. If the grantor or the person who holds the title of
record indicates on the form his election to waive mediation or
fails to return the form to the trustee as required by this
subsection, the trustee shall execute an affidavit attesting to that
fact under penalty of perjury and serve a copy of the affidavit,
together with the waiver of mediation by the grantor or the person
who holds the title of record, or proof of service on the grantor or
the person who holds the title of record of the notice required by
subsection 2 of this section and subsection 3 of NRS 107.080,
upon the Mediation Administrator. Upon receipt of the affidavit
and the waiver or proof of service, the Mediation Administrator
shall provide to the trustee a certificate which provides that no
mediation is required in the matter.
. Each mediation required by this section must be conducted
by a senior justice, judge, hearing master or other designee
pursuant to the rules adopted pursuant to subsection 8. The
beneficiary of the deed of trust or his representative shall attend
the mediation. The grantor or his representative shall attend the
mediation if the grantor elected to enter into mediation, or the
person who holds the title of record or his representative shall
attend the mediation if the person who holds the title of record
elected to enter into mediation. The beneficiary of the deed of trust
shall bring to the mediation the original or a certified copy of the
deed of trust, the mortgage note and each assignment of the deed
of trust or mortgage note. If the beneficiary of the deed of trust is
represented at the mediation by another person, that person must
have authority to negotiate a loan modification on behalf of the
beneficiary of the deed of trust or have access at all times during
the mediation to a person with such authority.
. If the beneficiary of the deed of trust or his representativefails to attend the mediation, fails to participate in the mediation in
good faith or does not bring to the mediation each document
required by subsection 4 or does not have the authority or access
to a person with the authority required by subsection 4, the
mediator shall prepare and submit to the Mediation Administrator
a petition and recommendation concerning the imposition of
sanctions against the beneficiary of the deed of trust or his
representative. The court may issue an order imposing such
sanctions against the beneficiary of the deed of trust or his
representative as the court determines appropriate, including,
– 4 –
-
without limitation, requiring a loan modification in the manner
determined proper by the court.
. If the grantor or the person who holds the title of record
elected to enter into mediation and fails to attend the mediation,
the Mediation Administrator shall provide to the trustee a
certificate which states that no mediation is required in the matter.
. If the mediator determines that the parties, while acting ingood faith, are not able to agree to a loan modification, the
mediator shall prepare and submit to the Mediation Administrator
a recommendation that the matter be terminated. The Mediation
Administrator shall provide to the trustee a certificate which
provides that the mediation required by this section has been
completed in the matter.
. The Supreme Court shall adopt rules necessary to carry
out the provisions of this section. The rules must, without
limitation, include provisions:
(a) Designating an entity to serve as the Mediation
Administrator pursuant to this section. The entities that may be so
designated include, without limitation, the Administrative Office
of the Courts, the District Court of the county in which the
property is situated or any other judicial entity.
(b) Ensuring that mediations occur in an orderly and timely
manner.
(c) Requiring each party to a mediation to provide such
information as the mediator determines necessary.
(d) Establishing procedures to protect the mediation process
from abuse and to ensure that each party to the mediation acts in
good faith.
(e) Establishing a total fee of not more than $400 that may be
charged and collected by the Mediation Administrator for
mediation services pursuant to this section and providing that the
responsibility for payment of the fee must be shared equally by the
parties to the mediation.
. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 11, theprovisions of this section do not apply if:
(a) The grantor or the person who holds the title of record has
surrendered the property, as evidenced by a letter confirming the
surrender or delivery of the keys to the property to the trustee, the
beneficiary of the deed of trust or the mortgagee, or an authorized
agent thereof; or
(b) A petition in bankruptcy has been filed with respect to the
grantor or the person who holds the title of record under chapter
, 11, 12 or 13 of Title 11 of the United States Code and thethe case or granting relief from a stay of foreclosure.
. A noncommercial lender is not excluded from the
application of this section.
. The Mediation Administrator and each mediator who actspursuant to this section in good faith and without gross negligence
is immune from civil liability for those acts.
. As used in this section:
(a) “Mediation Administrator” means the entity so designated
pursuant to subsection 8.
(b) “Noncommercial lender” means a lender which makes a
loan secured by a deed of trust on owner-occupied housing and
which is not a bank, financial institution or other entity regulated
pursuant to title 55 or 56 of NRS.
(c) “Owner-occupied housing” means housing that is occupied
by an owner as his primary residence. The term does not include
any time share or other property regulated under chapter 119A of
NRS.
Sec. 2.
7.080 1. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 107.085,
NRS 107.080 is hereby amended to read as follows:
and section 1 of this act,
property is made after March 29, 1927, to secure the performance of
an obligation or the payment of any debt, a power of sale is hereby
conferred upon the trustee to be exercised after a breach of the
obligation for which the transfer is security.
. The power of sale must not be exercised, however, until:
(a)
case of any trust agreement coming into force:
(1) On or after July 1, 1949, and before July 1, 1957, the
grantor,
of record,
other person who has a subordinate lien or encumbrance of record
on the property
prescribed in subsection 3, failed to make good the deficiency in
performance or payment; or
(2) On or after July 1, 1957, the grantor,
interest,
under a subordinate deed of trust or any other person who has a
subordinate lien or encumbrance of record on the property
if any transfer in trust of any estate in real
[In] Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b), in the[or his successor in interest,] the person who holds the titlea beneficiary under a subordinate deed of trust or any[,] has , for a period of 15 days, computed as[or his successor in] the person who holds the title of record, a beneficiary[,] has ,
for a period of 35 days, computed as prescribed in subsection 3,
failed to make good the deficiency in performance or payment;
(b)
housing as defined in section 1 of this act, the grantor,
In the case of any trust agreement which concerns owneroccupied
– 6 –
-
the person who holds the title of record, a beneficiary under a
subordinate deed of trust or any other person who has a
subordinate lien or encumbrance of record on the property has,
for a period that commences in the manner and subject to the
requirements described in subsection 3 and expires 5 days before
the date of sale, failed to make good the deficiency in performance
or payment;
(c)
or the trustee first executes and causes to be recorded in the office of
the recorder of the county wherein the trust property, or some part
thereof, is situated a notice of the breach and of his election to sell
or cause to be sold the property to satisfy the obligation; and
The beneficiary, the successor in interest of the beneficiary
[
of the notice.
. The 15- or 35-day period provided in paragraph (a) ofsubsection 2
subsection 2,
which the notice of default and election to sell is recorded in the
office of the county recorder of the county in which the property is
located and a copy of the notice of default and election to sell is
mailed by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested and
with postage prepaid to the grantor
holds the title of record on the date the notice of default and election
to sell is recorded, at
known, otherwise to the address of the trust property. The notice of
default and election to sell must describe the deficiency in
performance or payment and may contain a notice of intent to
declare the entire unpaid balance due if acceleration is permitted by
the obligation secured by the deed of trust, but acceleration must not
occur if the deficiency in performance or payment is made good and
any costs, fees and expenses incident to the preparation or
recordation of the notice and incident to the making good of the
deficiency in performance or payment are paid within the time
specified in subsection 2.
. The trustee, or other person authorized to make the sale
under the terms of the trust deed or transfer in trust, shall, after
expiration of the 3-month period following the recording of the
notice of breach and election to sell, and before the making of
the sale, give notice of the time and place thereof by recording the
notice of sale and by:
(a) Providing the notice to each trustor and any other person
entitled to notice pursuant to this section by personal service or by
mailing the notice by registered or certified mail to the last known
(c)
] (d) Not less than 3 months have elapsed after the recording, or the period provided in paragraph (b) ofcommences on the first day following the day upon[, and] or to the person who[their respective addresses,] his address, if
– 7 –
-
address of the trustor and any other person entitled to such notice
pursuant to this section;
(b) Posting a similar notice particularly describing the property,
for 20 days successively, in three public places of the township or
city where the property is situated and where the property is to be
sold; and
(c) Publishing a copy of the notice three times, once each week
for 3 consecutive weeks, in a newspaper of general circulation in the
county where the property is situated.
. Every sale made under the provisions of this section andother sections of this chapter vests in the purchaser the title of the
grantor and his successors in interest without equity or right of
redemption. A sale made pursuant to this section may be declared
void by any court of competent jurisdiction in the county where the
sale took place if:
(a) The trustee or other person authorized to make the sale does
not substantially comply with the provisions of this section
any applicable provision of section 1 of this act;
[;] or
(b) Except as otherwise provided in subsection 6, an action is
commenced in the county where the sale took place within 90 days
after the date of the sale; and
(c) A notice of lis pendens providing notice of the pendency of
the action is recorded in the office of the county recorder of the
county where the sale took place within 30 days after
commencement of the action.
. If proper notice is not provided pursuant to subsection 3 or
paragraph (a) of subsection 4 to the grantor, to the person who holds
the title of record on the date the notice of default and election to
sell is recorded, to each trustor or to any other person entitled to
such notice, the person who did not receive such proper notice may
commence an action pursuant to subsection 5 within 120 days after
the date on which the person received actual notice of the sale.
. The sale of a lease of a dwelling unit of a cooperativehousing corporation vests in the purchaser title to the shares in the
corporation which accompany the lease.
Sec. 3.
7.085 1. With regard to a transfer in trust of an estate in
real property to secure the performance of an obligation or the
payment of a debt, the provisions of this section apply to the
exercise of a power of sale pursuant to NRS 107.080 only if:
(a) The trust agreement becomes effective on or after October 1,
03
NRS 107.085 is hereby amended to read as follows:
[; and
– 8 –
-
(b) On
agreement is subject to the provisions of § 152 of the Home
Ownership and Equity Protection Act of 1994, 15 U.S.C. §
02(aa), and the regulations adopted by the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System pursuant thereto, including, without
limitation, 12 C.F.R. § 226.32
(b) The trust agreement concerns owner-occupied housing as
defined in section 1 of this act.
] , and, on the date the trust agreement is made, the trust[.] ; or
. The trustee shall not exercise a power of sale pursuant to
NRS 107.080 unless:
(a) In the manner required by subsection 3, not later than 60
days before the date of the sale, the trustee causes to be served upon
the grantor
the form described in subsection 3; and
(b) If an action is filed in a court of competent jurisdiction
claiming an unfair lending practice in connection with the trust
agreement, the date of the sale is not less than 30 days after the date
the most recent such action is filed.
. The notice described in subsection 2 must be:(a) Served upon the grantor
record:
(1) Except as otherwise provided in subparagraph (2),
personal service or, if personal service cannot be timely effected, in
such other manner as a court determines is reasonably calculated to
afford notice to the grantor
record; or
(2) If the trust agreement concerns owner-occupied
housing as defined in section 1 of this act:
(I) By personal service;
(II) If the grantor or the person who holds the title of
record is absent from his place of residence or from his usual
place of business, by leaving a copy with a person of suitable age
and discretion at either place and mailing a copy to the grantor or
the person who holds the title of record at his place of residence or
place of business; or
(III) If the place of residence or business cannot be
ascertained, or a person of suitable age or discretion cannot be
found there, by posting a copy in a conspicuous place on the trust
property, delivering a copy to a person there residing if the person
can be found and mailing a copy to the grantor or the person who
holds the title of record at the place where the trust property is
situated;
or the person who holds the title of record a notice inor the person who holds the title ofby[;] or the person who holds the title ofand
– 9 –
-
(b) In substantially the following form, with the applicable
telephone numbers and mailing addresses provided on the notice
and a copy of the promissory note attached to the notice:
NOTICE
YOU ARE IN DANGER OF LOSING YOUR HOME!
Your home loan is being foreclosed. In
home will be sold and you will be forced to move. For help, call:
Consumer Credit Counseling _______________
The Attorney General __________________
The Division of Financial Institutions ________________
Legal Services ______________________
Your Lender ___________________
Nevada Fair Housing Center ________________
. This section does not prohibit a judicial foreclosure.
. As used in this section, “unfair lending practice” means anunfair lending practice described in NRS 598D.010 to 598D.150,
inclusive.
not less than 60 days your
Sec. 3.5.
7.095 1. The notice of default required by NRS 107.080
must also be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt
requested and with postage prepaid, to each guarantor or surety of
the debt. If the address of the guarantor or surety is unknown, the
notice must be sent to the address of the trust property. Failure to
give the notice, except as otherwise provided in subsection 3,
releases the guarantor or surety from his obligation to the
beneficiary, but does not affect the validity of a sale conducted
pursuant to NRS 107.080
surety to whom the notice was properly given.
. Failure to give the notice of default required by NRS
7.090, except as otherwise provided in subsection 3, releases the
obligation to the beneficiary of any person who has complied with
NRS 107.090 and who is or may otherwise be held liable for the
debt or other obligation secured by the deed of trust, but such a
failure does not affect the validity of a sale conducted pursuant to
NRS 107.080
notice was properly given pursuant to this section or to NRS
7.080 or 107.090.
. A guarantor, surety or other obligor is not released pursuantto this section if:
NRS 107.095 is hereby amended to read as follows:
[nor] or the obligation of any guarantor or[nor] or the obligation of any person to whom the
– 10 –
-
(a) The required notice is given at least 15 days before the later
of:
(1) The expiration of the 15- or 35-day period described in
paragraph (a) of subsection 2 of
NRS 107.080;
[or]
(2)
owner-occupied housing as defined in section 1 of this act, the
expiration of the period described in paragraph (b) of subsection 2
of NRS 107.080; or
(3)
beneficiary; or
(b) The notice is rescinded before the sale is advertised.
In the case of any trust agreement which concernsAny extension of [that] the applicable period by the
Sec. 4.
a new section to read as follows:
Chapter 2 of NRS is hereby amended by adding thereto
The Supreme Court may adopt rules providing for voluntary
mediation with respect to a homeowner who is not in default but is
at risk of default.
Sec. 5.
management of a parcel of real property, holds or is the beneficiary
of evidence of title to the property primarily to protect a security
interest in the property is not a responsible party with respect to a
release of a hazardous substance on the property if:
(a) The owner of the property is relieved from liability under
NRS 459.610 to 459.658, inclusive, with respect to the release;
(b) The owner or holder of evidence of title did not cause the
release; and
(c) The owner or holder of evidence of title does not participate
actively in decisions concerning hazardous substances on the
property.
. A lender to a prospective purchaser who has filed an
application to participate in the program pursuant to NRS 459.634
or a lender who forecloses his security interest in property pursuant
to NRS 40.430 to 40.450, inclusive, or 107.080 to 107.100,
inclusive,
after the foreclosure, not to exceed 2 years, sells, transfers or
conveys the property to a prospective purchaser who has filed an
application to participate in the program pursuant to NRS 459.634 is
not a responsible party solely as a result of:
(a) Foreclosing a security interest in the property; or
(b) Making a loan to the prospective purchaser if the loan:
(1) Is to be used for acquiring property or removing or
remediating hazardous substances on property; and
NRS 459.646 is hereby amended to read as follows:
and section 1 of this act, and within a reasonable period
– 11 –
-
(2) Is secured by the property that is to be acquired or on
which is located the hazardous substances that are to be removed or
remediated.
Sec. 5.5.
agreements which concern owner-occupied housing, as defined in
section 1 of this act, apply only with respect to such agreements for
which a notice of default is recorded on or after July 1, 2009.
The amendatory provisions of this act governing trust
Sec. 5.7.
contrary and in recognition of the emergency situation confronting
this State concerning mortgage foreclosures and the need to
implement the provisions of this act quickly, any rules adopted by
the Supreme Court pursuant to subsection 8 of section 1 of this act
take effect on the date specified by the Supreme Court in the order
adopting the rules, which in no event may be less than 30 days after
entry of the order.
Notwithstanding any provision of NRS 2.120 to the
Sec. 6.
This act becomes effective on July 1, 2009.
~~~~~ 09
Tags: Assembly Bill, Assembly Bill 149, Assembly Bill 152, Bankruptcy, fixed loan, fixed mortgage, interest rate reduction, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, Law Firm, Law Office of Josh Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, lawsuit, legal representation, Litigation, loan mod, Loan Modification, loan modifications, loan restructuring, making home affordable, Mr. Harmon, principle reduction, short sale
Posted in Loan Modification | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009
This section is for frequently asked questions related to DUI’s. Please feel free to browse some of the most common questions we encounter when assisting people who are burdened with DUI’s.
Tags: Bike Accidents, blood alcohol testing, bui defense, Car Accidents, DUI Accidents, dui arrests, dui attorney, dui case tips, dui defense, dui lawyer, dui offenses, dui penalties, dui schools, faqs, federal dui, felony dui, field sobriety tests, insurance companies, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, Law Firm, Law Office of Josh Harmon, lawsuit, legal representation, Litigation, Paralysis, Pedestrian Accidents, Personal Injury, Truck Accidents, Wrongful Death
Posted in DUI | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009
This section is for frequently asked questions related to Bankruptcy. Please feel free to browse some of the most common questions we encounter when assisting people who are burdened with troublesome finanaces. Both Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 problems can be explained below.
Tags: Bankruptcy, Chapter 13, Chapter 7, faqs, fixed mortgage, Fresh Start, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, Law Firm, Law Office of Josh Harmon, loan modifications, making home affordable, Mr. Harmon, principle reduction, Reorganization, short sale, Slip and Fall Injuries, Traumatic Brain Injury, Wrongful Death
Posted in Bankruptcy | Comments Off
Saturday, August 1st, 2009
This section is for frequently asked questions related to Personal Injury Cases. Please feel free to browse some of the most common questions we encounter when assisting people who have suffered.
1.
Tags: Animal Attacks, Bankruptcy, Bike Accidents, Birth and Nursing Home Injuries, Blue Diamond, Boulder City, California Bar, Car Accidents, casino accidents, Clark County, Defective Products, discovery, Drunk Driving Accidents, DUI Accidents, Family Medical Leave Act, faqs, filing a complaint, fixed loan, fixed mortgage, Henderson, injured, insurance companies, interest rate reduction, Josh Harmon, Joshua L. Harmon, Lake Mead, Las Vegas, Law Firm, Law Office of Josh Harmon, Law Office of Joshua L. Harmon, lawsuit, leg injuries, legal representation, Litigation, loan restructuring, medical malpractice, Motorcycle Accidents, Mr. Harmon, negligent operation, negotiating, Nevada, Nevada Bar, Nevada Trial Lawyers Association, North Las Vegas, Nye County, Pahrump, Paralysis, Pedestrian Accidents, Pennsylvania Bar, Personal Injury, Pothole Fall, practice areas, premises liability, Product Liability, short sale, Slip and Fall Injuries, Spinal Cord Injury, Taxi Accident, TBI, Traumatic Brain Injury, Trial Attorney, Trip, Truck Accident, Truck Accidents, Uninsured Motorist, verdicts and settlements, Wrongful Death
Posted in Personal Injury | Comments Off